Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add stats support for job containers #979
Add stats support for job containers #979
Changes from all commits
012856b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's unclear to me if this is a safe operation. According to the unsafe package description:
So I would think that since you previously cast
systemProcInfo
to aSYSTEM_PROCESS_INFORMATION
pointer, then using pointer arithmetic with that beyond it's size would be invalid too even though we know that there's memory there that we've allocated and can access. IDK this may not be super relevant in this case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had a couple iterations of this that failed checkptr, but this passes so I'm erring on the side of this is fine but I'm open to keep digging here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My take is this is okay because the "original allocation" in this case is the
make([]byte, size)
on line 566, and we never advance past that allocation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the other hand, it would probably be a good idea to validate each
NextEntryOffset
and make sure it's still within the bounds ofsize
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kevpar Done, sorry for delay
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.