ios simulator arm64 and arm64e support

[swasti29]

Update cmake to consider platform passed as argument for building 1DS for ios simulator m1(arm64 and arm64e) architecture

[lalitb]

Changes look good to me. But it is important to get the approval from @eduardo-camacho before merging it. As mentioned in the mail discussion:

---

Please make sure to have tested following scenarios (actually linking library and makes sure it works; lipo checking might not be enough):

1. Simulator on M1
2. Simulator on Intel
3. Physical device on M1
4. Physical device on Intel

---

[eduardo-camacho]

Changes look good to me. But it is important to get the approval from @eduardo-camacho before merging it. As mentioned in the mail discussion:

Please make sure to have tested following scenarios (actually linking library and makes sure it works; lipo checking might not be enough):

1. Simulator on M1
2. Simulator on Intel
3. Physical device on M1
4. Physical device on Intel

Do you have an update on testing scenarios above?

[eduardo-camacho]

Left a nit

[lalitb]

Have few comments.

[swasti29]

Changes look good to me. But it is important to get the approval from @eduardo-camacho before merging it. As mentioned in the mail discussion:

Please make sure to have tested following scenarios (actually linking library and makes sure it works; lipo checking might not be enough):

1. Simulator on M1
2. Simulator on Intel
3. Physical device on M1
4. Physical device on Intel

I have tested with and without optional deployment target paramter by linking library on Simulator and Physical device with both M1 and Intel

[swasti29]

I have tested with and without optional deployment target paramter by linking library on Simulator and Physical device with both M1 and Intel

Have few comments.

Resolved

[swasti29]

Changes look good to me. But it is important to get the approval from @eduardo-camacho before merging it. As mentioned in the mail discussion:
Please make sure to have tested following scenarios (actually linking library and makes sure it works; lipo checking might not be enough):

1. Simulator on M1
2. Simulator on Intel
3. Physical device on M1
4. Physical device on Intel

Do you have an update on testing scenarios above?

I have tested with and without optional deployment target paramter by linking library on Simulator and Physical device with both M1 and Intel.

[lalitb]

@swasti29 - Changes look good now. You should be able to merge this PR once CI checks are completed ( you may have to rerun the CI check incase of transient failures ).

[eduardo-camacho]

@swasti29 - Changes look good now. You should be able to merge this PR once CI checks are completed ( you may have to rerun the CI check incase of transient failures ).

I approved yesterday night, we are good to go. Thanks!