Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ServiceFabricDeploy] Test application package only if copy and register is going to happen #7524

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 21, 2018
Merged

[ServiceFabricDeploy] Test application package only if copy and register is going to happen #7524

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
7539d90
Port from releases/m136: Fix SF deploy task (#7522)
bishal-pdMSFT Jun 20, 2018
b90cbd1
test application package only if necessary
bishal-pdMSFT Jun 20, 2018
daeea7e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into fixSFTask1
bishal-pdMSFT Jun 20, 2018
bd14d5a
PR comments
bishal-pdMSFT Jun 21, 2018
72f1512
remove warning log
bishal-pdMSFT Jun 21, 2018
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
22 changes: 12 additions & 10 deletions Tasks/ServiceFabricDeployV1/ServiceFabricSDK/Publish-NewServiceFabricApplication.ps1
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -140,16 +140,7 @@
throw $errMsg
}

if (!$SkipPackageValidation)
{
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.TestApplicationPackage
$packageValidationSuccess = (Test-ServiceFabricApplicationPackage $AppPkgPathToUse)
if (!$packageValidationSuccess)
{
$errMsg = (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_PackageValidationFailed -ArgumentList $ApplicationPackagePath)
throw $errMsg
}
}


$ApplicationManifestPath = "$AppPkgPathToUse\ApplicationManifest.xml"

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -271,6 +262,17 @@
}
if (!$reg -or !$ApplicationTypeAlreadyRegistered)
{
if (!$SkipPackageValidation)
{
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.TestApplicationPackage
$packageValidationSuccess = (Test-ServiceFabricApplicationPackage $AppPkgPathToUse)
if (!$packageValidationSuccess)
{
$errMsg = (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_PackageValidationFailed -ArgumentList $ApplicationPackagePath)
throw $errMsg
}
}

Write-Host (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_CopyingAppToImageStore)
# Get image store connection string
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.GetClusterManifest
Expand Down
33 changes: 17 additions & 16 deletions Tasks/ServiceFabricDeployV1/ServiceFabricSDK/Publish-UpgradedServiceFabricApplication.ps1
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -185,21 +185,6 @@ function Publish-UpgradedServiceFabricApplication
return
}

# Get image store connection string
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.GetClusterManifest
$clusterManifestText = Get-ServiceFabricClusterManifest
$imageStoreConnectionString = Get-ImageStoreConnectionStringFromClusterManifest ([xml] $clusterManifestText)

if (!$SkipPackageValidation)
{
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.TestApplicationPackage
$packageValidationSuccess = (Test-ServiceFabricApplicationPackage $AppPkgPathToUse -ImageStoreConnectionString $imageStoreConnectionString)
if (!$packageValidationSuccess)
{
$errMsg = (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_PackageValidationFailed -ArgumentList $ApplicationPackagePath)
throw $errMsg
}
}

try
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -250,6 +235,22 @@ function Publish-UpgradedServiceFabricApplication

if (!$reg -or !$ApplicationTypeAlreadyRegistered)
{
# Get image store connection string
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.GetClusterManifest
$clusterManifestText = Get-ServiceFabricClusterManifest
$imageStoreConnectionString = Get-ImageStoreConnectionStringFromClusterManifest ([xml] $clusterManifestText)

if (!$SkipPackageValidation)
{
$global:operationId = $SF_Operations.TestApplicationPackage
$packageValidationSuccess = (Test-ServiceFabricApplicationPackage $AppPkgPathToUse -ImageStoreConnectionString $imageStoreConnectionString)
if (!$packageValidationSuccess)
{
$errMsg = (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_PackageValidationFailed -ArgumentList $ApplicationPackagePath)
throw $errMsg
}
}

$applicationPackagePathInImageStore = $names.ApplicationTypeName
Write-Host (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_CopyingAppToImageStore)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -383,7 +384,7 @@ function Publish-UpgradedServiceFabricApplication
if ($UnregisterUnusedVersions)
{
Write-Host (Get-VstsLocString -Key SFSDK_UnregisterUnusedVersions)
foreach ($registeredAppTypes in Get-ServiceFabricApplicationTypeAction -ApplicationTypeName $names.ApplicationTypeName | Where-Object { $_.ApplicationTypeVersion -ne $names.ApplicationTypeVersion })
foreach ($registeredAppTypes in Get-ServiceFabricApplicationTypeAction -ApplicationTypeName $names.ApplicationTypeName)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rename variable $registeredAppTypes to $registeredAppType

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#Fixed

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just for the info, please let me know the reason to remove 'Where-Object' clause from the query

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$UnregisterUnusedVersions means that any unused type should be unregistered. We were excluding current version as it is being used in upgrade. However, the upgrade might fail and that means type is not in use. Hence, now we will try to unregister all types. If upgrade was successful, unregister to current type will fail - but that error will be supressed.

{
try
{
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If business use case is to consume the error in case of AppType and Version in use then its better to check for error code "ApplicationTypeInUse" instead of consuming System.Fabric.FabricException

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO use case is to suppress any kind of exception. We don't want task to fail due to failure here. Infact I will remove [System.Fabric.FabricException] from here as well

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets communicate to the users by surfacing a warning message in case of failures

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Expand Down