Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

App Service Settings Changes #11211

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

eaarora-ms
Copy link
Contributor

@eaarora-ms eaarora-ms commented Aug 26, 2019

Changes made:

  1. The task fails when it is a no-op (i.e. connection strings/ app settings/ general settings all are empty)
  2. Code owners added
  3. Variable names changed to follow camelCase

Tasks/AzureAppServiceSettingsV1/task.json Show resolved Hide resolved
if(!AppSettings || !ConfigurationSettings || !ConnectionStrings) {
throw Error(tl.loc("AppServiceSettingsNotEnabled"));
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should target a batch call for the next iteration

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ Tasks/ArchiveFilesV2/* @bryanmacfarlane

Tasks/AzureAppServiceManageV0/* @kmkumaran @SumiranAgg @vincentdass

Tasks/AzureAppServiceSettingsV1/* @eaarora-ms @SumiranAgg @vincentdass @niadak
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@eaarora-ms eaarora-ms merged commit 34170fa into microsoft:master Aug 27, 2019
eaarora-ms added a commit to eaarora-ms/azure-pipelines-tasks that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
* App Service Settings Changes

* Code owners added
eaarora-ms added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
* New task for App service settings  (#11020)

* App Service Settings Changes (#11211)

* Code owners added
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants