Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: skip codecov publish report step in ci pipeline #7454

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

v-rakeshsh
Copy link
Contributor

@v-rakeshsh v-rakeshsh commented Sep 26, 2024

Details

Skip codecoverage step in pipeline as codecov package is deprecated.

Pull request checklist

  • Addresses an existing issue: #0000
  • Ran yarn fastpass
  • Added/updated relevant unit test(s) (and ran yarn test)
  • Verified code coverage for the changes made. Check coverage report at: <rootDir>/test-results/unit/coverage
  • PR title AND final merge commit title both start with a semantic tag (fix:, chore:, feat(feature-name):, refactor:). See CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • (UI changes only) Added screenshots/GIFs to description above
  • (UI changes only) Verified usability with NVDA/JAWS

@v-rakeshsh v-rakeshsh requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 06:08
@v-rakeshsh v-rakeshsh changed the title initial checkin to disable publish report fix: initial checkin to disable publish report Sep 26, 2024
@v-rakeshsh v-rakeshsh changed the title fix: initial checkin to disable publish report fix: skip codecov publish report step in ci pipeline Sep 26, 2024
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pipeline/build-shared.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@v-viyada v-viyada dismissed brocktaylor7’s stale review September 27, 2024 18:16

Brock is oof today

@v-viyada v-viyada merged commit 54432b3 into main Sep 27, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants