-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve detection of cases where subtype reduction is unnecessary #53435
Conversation
@typescript-bot test this |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at aab1be6. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the abridged perf test suite on this PR at aab1be6. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at aab1be6. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at aab1be6. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at aab1be6. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
@ahejlsberg Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing Everything looks good! |
@ahejlsberg Here they are:Comparison Report - main..53435
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@ahejlsberg Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
The new errors above actually seem... good? |
Looks like people who declared something with let x: void | number;
if (maybe) {
x = 32;
}
x; now get an error, which they absolutely should have. |
Hey @ahejlsberg, it looks like the DT test run failed. Please check the log for more details. |
@typescript-bot run dt |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at aab1be6. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
@jakebailey @RyanCavanaugh I think the new errors are better. They're caused by the change to use |
Hey @jakebailey, it looks like the DT test run failed. Please check the log for more details. |
To be fair, nobody should be declaring things as |
Fixes #53425.