-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Number Series Copilot] Bug Fixes in Intent Understanding and Field Validation #2111
[Number Series Copilot] Bug Fixes in Intent Understanding and Field Validation #2111
Conversation
…ation Summary: This commit resolves three bugs in the Number Series generation process. It improves intent mapping for the "Generate" command, corrects field checks for existing Number Series, and refines validation logic to allow optional fields to be blank. These fixes enhance the accuracy and reliability of Number Series generation. Fixes microsoft#2106
@JesperSchulz you should update:
BUT Important! These should have new version starting from v25.1 . For the v25.0 they should stay current, as they aligned with the function in AL that changed name in v25.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than the pending TODOs, I'm fine with this PR. But let's wait for Darricks return to see if we cannot find a more elegant solution of versioning prompts, other than creating new ones which replace the old ones.
src/Business Foundation/App/NoSeriesCopilot/src/Copilot/NoSeriesCopilotImpl.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...Business Foundation/App/NoSeriesCopilot/src/Copilot/Tools/NoSeriesCopNxtYrIntent.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@DmitryKatson, we should get this ready. Could you ensure the build passes? |
@JesperSchulz @darjoo fixed previous build errors |
@darjoo just noticed - the learn more link is still not updated. |
…opNxtYrIntent.Codeunit.al
…alidation (#2111) <!-- Thank you for submitting a Pull Request. If you're new to contributing to BCApps please read our pull request guideline below * https://github.com/microsoft/BCApps/Contributing.md --> #### Summary <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes --> This PR addresses three critical bugs in the Number Series Copilot: 1. **Bug 1: Incorrect Intent Mapping for "Generate" Command** - The system was misinterpreting the "generate" command, often preparing Number Series for the next period instead of creating a new one. The fix involves updating the tools definition and prompt to clarify the distinction between creating new Number Series and generating Number Series for the next period. 2. **Bug 2: Incorrect Field Check for Existing Number Series** - The system was incorrectly performing checks on all fields for existing Number Series. The fix modifies the behavior to exclude pre-existing Number Series from the field validation checks, ensuring that only mandatory fields are validated for AI generated series. 3. **Bug 3: Blank Fields Causing Validation Errors** - The system was generating Number Series without values for optional fields, causing validation errors. The fix refines the validation logic so that only mandatory fields are checked, allowing optional fields to remain blank if necessary. **Steps to Implement:** 1. Refactor the LLM prompt and tools definition to improve the understanding of user intent between creating and preparing Number Series for different periods. 2. Update the logic to exclude field checks for existing Number Series and restrict checks to mandatory fields. **Acceptance Criteria:** - Users can create Number Series without mistakenly triggering next-period Number Series generation when using the word "generate." - Existing Number Series are excluded from unnecessary checks, and only mandatory fields are validated for new series. These fixes aim to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the Number Series Copilot, ensuring it correctly interprets user commands and validates the necessary fields. #### Work Item(s) <!-- Add the issue number here after the #. The issue needs to be open and approved. Submitting PRs with no linked issues or unapproved issues is highly discouraged. --> Fixes #2106 Fixes [AB#550892](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/1fcb79e7-ab07-432a-a3c6-6cf5a88ba4a5/_workitems/edit/550892), [AB#544073](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/1fcb79e7-ab07-432a-a3c6-6cf5a88ba4a5/_workitems/edit/544073)
…ield V… (#2251) …alidation (#2111) <!-- Thank you for submitting a Pull Request. If you're new to contributing to BCApps please read our pull request guideline below * https://github.com/microsoft/BCApps/Contributing.md --> #### Summary <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes --> This PR addresses three critical bugs in the Number Series Copilot: 1. **Bug 1: Incorrect Intent Mapping for "Generate" Command** - The system was misinterpreting the "generate" command, often preparing Number Series for the next period instead of creating a new one. The fix involves updating the tools definition and prompt to clarify the distinction between creating new Number Series and generating Number Series for the next period. 2. **Bug 2: Incorrect Field Check for Existing Number Series** - The system was incorrectly performing checks on all fields for existing Number Series. The fix modifies the behavior to exclude pre-existing Number Series from the field validation checks, ensuring that only mandatory fields are validated for AI generated series. 3. **Bug 3: Blank Fields Causing Validation Errors** - The system was generating Number Series without values for optional fields, causing validation errors. The fix refines the validation logic so that only mandatory fields are checked, allowing optional fields to remain blank if necessary. **Steps to Implement:** 1. Refactor the LLM prompt and tools definition to improve the understanding of user intent between creating and preparing Number Series for different periods. 2. Update the logic to exclude field checks for existing Number Series and restrict checks to mandatory fields. **Acceptance Criteria:** - Users can create Number Series without mistakenly triggering next-period Number Series generation when using the word "generate." - Existing Number Series are excluded from unnecessary checks, and only mandatory fields are validated for new series. These fixes aim to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the Number Series Copilot, ensuring it correctly interprets user commands and validates the necessary fields. #### Work Item(s) <!-- Add the issue number here after the #. The issue needs to be open and approved. Submitting PRs with no linked issues or unapproved issues is highly discouraged. --> Fixes #2106 Fixes [AB#555649](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/1fcb79e7-ab07-432a-a3c6-6cf5a88ba4a5/_workitems/edit/555649) Co-authored-by: Dmitry Katson <[email protected]>
Summary
This PR addresses three critical bugs in the Number Series Copilot:
Bug 1: Incorrect Intent Mapping for "Generate" Command
Bug 2: Incorrect Field Check for Existing Number Series
Bug 3: Blank Fields Causing Validation Errors
Steps to Implement:
Acceptance Criteria:
These fixes aim to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the Number Series Copilot, ensuring it correctly interprets user commands and validates the necessary fields.
Work Item(s)
Fixes #2106
Fixes AB#550892, AB#544073