Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make OtelSpan public instead of package-private #808

Closed
ThomasVitale opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #809
Closed

Make OtelSpan public instead of package-private #808

ThomasVitale opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #809
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@ThomasVitale
Copy link
Contributor

ThomasVitale commented Aug 13, 2024

The OtelSpan class implementing the Span interface is package private, which makes it not possible to act on the underlying OpenTelemetry Span object (unless Reflection is used). One use case for this would be to add structured events to a Span (necessary until micrometer-metrics/micrometer#5238 is implemented).

That is different from the BraveSpan class, which is set as public.

Is it possible to make OtelSpan public in the 1.3.x release line?

ThomasVitale added a commit to ThomasVitale/micrometer-tracing that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
@ThomasVitale
Copy link
Contributor Author

In case the feature request is accepted, I drafted a PR to align the visibility of OtelSpan to the one of BridgeSpan. #809

ThomasVitale added a commit to ThomasVitale/micrometer-tracing that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2024
@jonatan-ivanov jonatan-ivanov added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 19, 2024
@jonatan-ivanov jonatan-ivanov added this to the 1.4.0-RC1 milestone Sep 19, 2024
jonatan-ivanov pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants