Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide improved guidance for “experimental factor- other" #209

Open
Tracked by #587
pvangay opened this issue Feb 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #587

Provide improved guidance for “experimental factor- other" #209

pvangay opened this issue Feb 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
GSP2023 Add to any issue related to GSP 2023 goals question Further information is requested

Comments

@pvangay
Copy link

pvangay commented Feb 10, 2022

How does “experimental factor- other" differ from "experimental factor"? Clear examples would be really useful for “experimental factor- other", especially since the description for "experimental factor" is very thorough. I actually completely missed that there was even an "experimental factor" term and thought that the "- other" was just a typo.

Please confirm next steps @mslarae13 then reassign to @turbomam for updating.

@pvangay pvangay added the question Further information is requested label Feb 10, 2022
@pvangay pvangay changed the title Review and update naming of the term “experimental factor- other" Provide improved guidance for “experimental factor- other" Feb 10, 2022
@pvangay pvangay added the GSP2023 Add to any issue related to GSP 2023 goals label Feb 10, 2022
@mslarae13
Copy link
Contributor

experimental factors is a controlled field that is ONLY supposed to accept OBO or ENVO ontologies. I added the -other for when a user has something they need to detail, but it doesn't have an ontology.
It might never get used. But I feel we should include it and see as opposed to limiting people and missing information.
I agree examples would help & we could add more detail to the definition

@pkalita-lbl pkalita-lbl transferred this issue from microbiomedata/DataHarmonizer Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GSP2023 Add to any issue related to GSP 2023 goals question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants