Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine if and how various soil type/classification/taxonomy terms will be used in the submission schema #585

Open
4 tasks
Tracked by #587 ...
mslarae13 opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
backlog Issue not assigned to a sprint or not completed during a sprint. Needs to be reprioritized. nmdc-schema-mixs-submission unfinished wasn't completed during sprint, should be reprioritized and/or broken down to smaller issues

Comments

@mslarae13
Copy link
Contributor

mslarae13 commented Jan 6, 2023

soil_taxonomic/local classification method
soil_taxonomic/local classification
soil_type
soil type method
soil_taxonomic/FAO classification
link to classification information
-- Removed?

These slots are very similar. We should discuss these slots and provide clearer separation between the types and better guidance on how to use / identify

Resolution

  • Provide Montana an export from NCBI of metadata records that included this field and how they wrote it (@turbomam )
  • Evaluate usage of these slots across database and determine if all are being used / how (Montana)
  • examples and guidance are added to slot usage (Montana)
  • Implement these changes to NMDC submission portal (Mark & Kitware
@mslarae13 mslarae13 moved this to 📋 Backlog in SubPort Squad Issues Jan 6, 2023
@mslarae13 mslarae13 changed the title Submission portal- soil template- soil_taxonomic/local classification method Submission portal- soil template- soil types Jan 6, 2023
@mslarae13 mslarae13 mentioned this issue Jan 6, 2023
99 tasks
@mslarae13 mslarae13 moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🔖 Ready in SubPort Squad Issues May 5, 2023
@turbomam
Copy link
Member

turbomam commented May 21, 2023

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

turbomam commented May 21, 2023

From GSC

https://github.com/GenomicsStandardsConsortium/mixs/blob/main/mixs/excel/mixs_v6.xlsx

Environmental package agriculture soil
Structured comment name fao_class fao_class
Package item soil_taxonomic/FAO classification soil_taxonomic/FAO classification
Definition Soil classification from the FAO World Reference Database for Soil Resources. The list can be found at http://www.fao.org/nr/land/sols/soil/wrb-soil-maps/reference-groups Soil classification from the FAO World Reference Database for Soil Resources. The list can be found at http://www.fao.org/nr/land/sols/soil/wrb-soil-maps/reference-groups
Expected value enumeration enumeration
Value syntax {term} [Acrisols|Andosols|Arenosols|Cambisols|Chernozems|Ferralsols|Fluvisols|Gleysols|Greyzems|Gypsisols|Histosols|Kastanozems|Lithosols|Luvisols|Nitosols|Phaeozems|Planosols|Podzols|Podzoluvisols|Rankers|Regosols|Rendzinas|Solonchaks|Solonetz|Vertisols|Yermosols]
Example   Luvisols
Requirement C X
Preferred unit    
Occurrence 1 1
MIXS ID MIXS:0001083 MIXS:0001083

In production NMDC MongoDB

db.getCollection("biosample_set").find( { fao_class : { $exists : true } } );

0

In BBOP relational version of NCBI's biosample_set

select
	value,
	count(1)
from
	all_attribs aa
where
	aa.harmonized_name = 'fao_class'
group by
	value
having
	count(1) > 1
order by
	count(1) desc;
value count
Cambisol 516
not applicable 444
not collected 431
rendzina 368
Oxisol 301
Typic Hapludalfs 270
Luvisols 264
Mollisol 232
Endostagnic Luvisol from glacial till 192
using EC meter (HORIBA) with a 2:5 soil/water suspension 192
Haplic Chernozem 170
Histic Andosol 160
Chernozem 143
Hoytville silty clay loam 133
Kokomo silty clay loam 132
calcaric leptic cambisols 131
Phaeozem 126
Fluvisol 120
sandy loam 104
cambisol 101
chernozem 100
Greyzemic Phaeozem Albic 97
"Fine-silty, mixed, thermic Oxyaquic Fragiudalfs" 96
"Fine, mixed, active, mesic Typic Paleudalfs" 90
mesic Lamellic Hapludalfs 90
Typic Argiudoll 88
loess 80
using EC meter (LAQUAtwin EC-33B, HORIBA) with a 1:10 soil/water suspension (mS cm-1) 78
NA 72
Vitric eutric epiarenic 72
missing 67
Typic Argiudolls 66
podzol 64
Podzol 59
Luvisol 56
Andosol 56
Luvic Phaeozem 54
Nitisol 51
Typic Hapludalf 48
Arenosol 48
"Fine-loamy, mixed, subactive, thermic typic Hapludults" 47
Calcaric, Eutric Fluvisol 36
Umbric Epistagnic Albeluvisol 36
Leptosol 36
Gleysol 36
Histosol 34
Cryosol 31
3a 30
using EC meter (LAQUAtwin EC-33B, HORIBA) with a 1:5 soil/water suspension 30
Haplic Phaeozem 27
Pellic Vertisol 27
Ferralsol 25
arenosols 24
Stagnosol 22
sod-podzolic 22
Earth-cumuli-Orthic Anthrosols 21
Chromic Luvisol 21
using EC meter (LAQUAtwin EC-33B, HORIBA) with a 2:5 soil/water suspension (mS cm-1) 20
na 19
Calcisols 18
andosol 17
Mottled Fragic Pallic Soil (Ustochrept) 16
loess chernozem 16
Vertisol 14
Regosol 12
Planosol 12
Oxisols 12
Cambisols 10
Phaozem 9
0 6
Haplic Luvisol 6
Isbell 2002 6
Geric Ferralsol 5
Stagnic Cambisol 4
Cambisol (almost Ferralsol) 3
Umbrisol 3
loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, mesic Lithic Dystrudept 3
Kastanozem 3
histosol 3
fluvisol 3
Lithosol 3
phaeozem 2
gypsisol 2
vertisol 2
ferralsols 2

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

Environmental package agriculture soil
Structured comment name local_class local_class
Package item soil_taxonomic/local classification soil_taxonomic/local classification
Definition Soil classification based on local soil classification system Soil classification based on local soil classification system
Expected value local classification name local classification name
Value syntax {text} {text}
Example    
Requirement C X
Preferred unit    
Occurrence 1 1
MIXS ID MIXS:0000330 MIXS:0000330
value count
not collected 432
not applicable 415
3% humus, 22 % clay, 38 % silt 324
clayish 293
Freeon silt loam 264
Wahiawa 253
Medial-skeletal, amorphic, mesic Humic Haploxerand 243
Waialua 232
sandy loam, 3.5 % humus 216
sandy loam 204
Coarse-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Humic Dystroxerept 200
Rego Black Chernozem 192
2% humus, 21 % clay, 32 % silt 180
Loamy-skeletal, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Haploxerept 177
silty clay loam 166
dark brown forest soil 162
NA 137
KaC 135
OsD 135
Rendzina (RR) 120
histosol 105
Orthic Humo-Ferric Podzol 99
Flanagan silt loam 96
Bloomfield 90
Brown coniferous forest soil 67
missing 65
Typic Argiudoll 54
Typic Argiudoll, with a silty clay texture 47
Typic Dystrudepts 45
Fluvaquentic humaquept 36
Sandy loam 30
Entic Haplustoll 27
Argic Pelludert 27
Aquic Glossudalfs 23
Histic Pergelic Cryaquepts 23
Mesic Ultic Haploxeralfs 23
Brunisolic Gray Luvisol 21
Orthic Dystric Brunisol 21
Rudisol 20
na 18
candler fine sand 17
Sterling-Sheep Creek-Richmond-Foxol-Elzinga-Agassiz (s7785) 16
loess chernozem over limestone 16
Dermosol 15
Brown Andosol 14
Histic pergelic cryaquept 12
Nielsen-Dranyon-Dra (s2168) 12
Latossolo vermelho 12
Lithocalcic Calcarosol 12
Clay loam to silty clay loam over clay with flints 12
Gravelly Vitrisol 11
taylorsflat loam 8
Typic cryorthent 6
Rock outcrop-Henefer-Harkers-Gappmayer (s7849) 6
Rock outcrop-Mower-Lundy-Lizzant-Hamtah-Agassiz (s8168) 6
Travessilla-Rock outcrop-Midfork family (s7972) 6
Stafford loamy fine sand 6
Steed-Redola-Provo-Pleasant View-Pleasant Vale-Keigley (s7862) 6
Yeates Hollow-St marys-Moweba-Hoskin-Holmes (s7833) 6
Vertosol 5
aeolian sediment 5
Calcarosols 4
Calcarosol 4
Roundy-Fitzgerald-Daybell (s7884) 3
Yeates Hollow-Lucky Star-Hoskin-Horrocks-Gappmayer-Cloud Rim-Bradshaw-Ant Flat (s7886) 3
Lithic Udorthents 2
Vertosol (grey) 2
Tenosols 2
Paleudult 2
Paleudalf 2
db.getCollection("biosample_set").find( { local_class : { $exists : true } } );

0

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

Environmental package agriculture soil
Structured comment name local_class_meth local_class_meth
Package item soil_taxonomic/local classification method soil_taxonomic/local classification method
Definition Reference or method used in determining the local soil classification Reference or method used in determining the local soil classification
Expected value PMID,DOI or url PMID,DOI or url
Value syntax {PMID|DOI|URL} {PMID}|{DOI}|{URL}
Example    
Requirement C X
Preferred unit    
Occurrence 1 1
MIXS ID MIXS:0000331 MIXS:0000331
value count
USDA Soil Survey Taxonomy (2003) 620
Swiss Federal Research Stations FAL RAC FAW, 1996. Swiss Reference Methods of the Federal Agricultural Research Stations. Soil and Substrate Research for the Fertilizer Advisory Service (Arable, Fodder, Fruit Farming, Viniculture and Horticulture), vol. 1. Swiss Federal Research Stations. 504
not collected 432
not applicable 415
SoilWeb 270
USDA soil classification 264
VDLUFA Methodenbuch, D 2.1, ISO 10694:1995 216
http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/taxonomy 214
NA 137
Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung (Ad-hoc-Arbeitsgruppe Boden der Staatlichen Geologischen Dienste und der Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) 120
INTA soil map (http://geointa.inta.gov.ar/visor/?p=model_suelos) 108
NRCS 96
missing 65
Australian Soil Classification 30
na 19
World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) 16
Isbell, 2002, The Australian Soil Classification, revised edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne) 15
EMBRAPA 12
Isbell, R.F. 2002 The Australian Soil Classification. Melbourne, CSIRO Publishing. 12
websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 6
Santos, H.G., Jacomine, P.K.T., Anjos, L.H.C. dos, Oliveira, V. ., Lumbreras, J.F., Coelho, M.R., Almeida, J.A., Cunha, T.J.F., Oliveira, J.B., 2014. Sistema brasileiro de classifica o de solos, 4th ed. Embrapa, Bras lia, DF. 6
Argiudol typic/USDA Soil Taxonomy 5
Argiudol vertic/USDA Soil Taxonomy 4
Haplustol entic/USDA Soil Taxonomy 4
db.getCollection("biosample_set").find( { local_class_meth : { $exists : true } } );

0

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

Environmental package agriculture food-farm environment soil
Structured comment name soil_type soil_type soil_type
Package item soil type soil type soil type
Definition Soil series name or other lower-level classification Description of the soil type or classification. This field accepts terms under soil (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00001998). Multiple terms can be separated by pipes. Description of the soil type or classification. This field accepts terms under soil (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00001998). Multiple terms can be separated by pipes.
Expected value soil type name ENVO_00001998 ENVO_00001998
Value syntax {text} {termLabel} {[termID]} {termLabel} {[termID]}
Example   plinthosol [ENVO:00002250] plinthosol [ENVO:00002250]
Requirement M X X
Preferred unit      
Occurrence 1 m 1
MIXS ID MIXS:0000332 MIXS:0000332 MIXS:0000332
value count
Cambisol 1815
pine_forest 1632
Luvisol 1281
M21 1266
fine sandy loam 733
silt loam (2-4% slopes; fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic mollic oxyaquic hapludalf) 708
Inceptisol 636
not applicable 609
Pond Creek fine sandy loam (Pachic Argiustoll) 530
loam 466
not collected 437
Crop 390
NA 385
Rozetta silt loam 336
forest 319
50:50 mixture of steam-sterilized native soil and Metro-Mix 200 growing media 314
Agricultural Mollisol from a Fallow Casssava Field 312
Rhizosphere 309
Thrice Heat Steriled River Sand 306
Bulk 296
sandy loam 291
bulk 282
desert 270
grassland 266
Freeon silt loam 264
Rendzic Leptosol and Chromic Cambisol 256
arable sandy soil 254
SoilB 248
SoilA 245
Andesite 243
Strip 240
away 234
alfisol 227
Luvisol WRB 222
Orthic Black Chernozem 222
Pecatonica silt loam 216
Udalfs 214
alluvial sandy soil 213
Coarse-loamy.mixed.active.mesic_Typic_Dystrudepts 211
Eluviated dystric brunisol 210
Granite 200
Missing: Not provided 190
rhizosphere 189
Sandy 185
Haplic Phaeozem 184
Basalt 177
fine mixed thermic Cumulic Haplustoll 176
Xerolls 175
American ginseng continuous cropping obstacle soil 174
control 172
Arensols and Luvisols 170
canna coco 170
SoilC 168
- 168
SoilD 168
Albi-Boric Argosols 162
Coarse-loamy_over_sandy_or_sandy-skeletal.mixed.active.mesic_Typic_Dystrudepts 161
sandy soil 160
Eutric Fluvisol 159
Chernozem 156
promix 150
home 139
Not applicable 136
Hoytville silty clay loam 133
bulk soil 132
Kokomo silty clay loam 132
unfamiliar 131
10% field soil inoculum 124
Rendzina (RR) 120
sandy clay loam 120
Sand 119
Alluvial 110
Haplic Kastanozem 108
water 108
missing 101
familiar 97
Greyzemic Phaeozem Albic 97
Cultivated soil 96
Fallow soil 96
loam Acrisol 96
Loring B2 series 96
clay Acrisols 95
Lush serpentine 94
rhizosphere soil 92
Maury silt loam 90
Harsh serpentine 86
Non-serpentine 84
Ultisol 81
Mollisol 81
Orthic Humic Gleysol 80
phaeozems 80
histosol 78
sandy silty clay 78
clay 74
Rich Lake 73
loam Acrisol with long periods of stagnating water 72
Silty Clay Loam 72
Typic Ustivitrands 72
Ultic Hapludalf/Typic Fragiudult 72
saline-alkali soil 70
loamy sand 69
Brown Forest soil 68
Bori-Udic Cambosols 67
Typic Mesisol 65
loess chernozem over limestone 64
Regosol 63
Fort Collins loam 61
Mollisols 60
O 60
Hyposodic Vertisol 60
Chromic Luvisol 60
Interface 60
Luvic-Phaeozem 60
Loamy Sand 60
Residual 57
Gleyic-Fluvisol 56
SG 56
Typic Argiudoll 54
saneli silty clay loam 54
cambisol 53
FF 52
Soddy podzolic 52
black earth 52
Arenic-Luvisol 52
Mor 51
Bulk_soil 49
Leptosol 49
Submerged_zone 48
cultivated soil 48
agricultural 48
corn 48
RV 48
nitisol 48
Top_sediment 48
clay acrisol 48
coarse loamy inceptisol 48
switchgrass 48
Shady 47
loam acrisol 47
luvisol 46
Dystric cambisol 45
Clay 44
D 40
L 40
red_soil (south of China) 40
soil_type not involve 40
black_soil (north of China) 40
Nonserp 40
Silty_Clay_Loam 39
S+NSmic 39
Sandy_Loam 38
Brownzems raw-humic illuvial-humic 38
calcareous ?uvo-aquic soil 37
Sodosol 37
1 37
Mountain-meadow soddy 36
Rice Soil 36
Serp 36
Manure 36
Loamy 36
Forest Soil 36
NS+Smic 36
Rich 35
Poor 35
silty clay 35
Silt 35
Stagnosol 34
Xeralfs 34
Gray Brown Luvisol 33
Eutric Fluvisols 33
Cancienne silt loam 32
Leaf litter residuum 32
mycobiome 32
Canton 30
Mesic Typic Argiudoll 30
Sandy loam 29
Calcisol 28
stony silty clay loam 28
Loessal Soil 28
silty clay loam 28
Eum-Orthic Anthrosols 28
Albic Luvisol 28
calcareous fluvo-aquic soil 27
Mor-moder 27
cambsiol 27
Captured Dust 27
Argic Pelludert 27
Gypsum 27
Sandy_loam 27
Bulk Soil 27
Elstow orthic dark brown loam 27
Silty Loam 27
sand 27
Entic Haplustoll 27
Vertisol 24
Limnic Humisol 24
Silt loam 24
Acrisol 24
Mollic Psammaquent 24
continuous cropping soil 24
Haplic Planosol 24
rotational cropping soil 24
Cast 24
Rhizo 24
Orthents 23
pristine peat soil 23
clayey 23
soil sample 23
Silty 23
Medium Soil 21
silt 21
Andosol 21
Alluvials saturated 21
"CA" 21
N/A 20
black soil 20
Cutanic Luvisol developed from glacial till 20
Gray lowland soil 20
"CL" 19
Loam 19
3 19
mollisol 19
sandy clay 19
Mountain-meadow sod-peaty 19
na 18
Black soil 18
Podzol soil 18
Rich Soil 18
A 18
clayey sand 18
G 18
S 18
Sediment 18
Orthic Gray Luvisol 17
mineral soil 17
inceptisol 17
Groundwater sediment 17
Soil fertilised with sludge 17
Soil fertilised with slurry 16
Macdonald 16
monomicrobial soil 16
Soil fertilised with mineral 16
Stages of soiling 16
mixed microbial soil 16
Organic 16
control (sterilized) soil 16
Leptosol /Sand 16
Soil fertilised with usw 16
oxisol 16
BNC 15
BRR 15
CAG 15
Poor Soil 15
BPP 15
Gloucester 15
Loess 15
BB 15
CCS 15
6 14
Chernozems leached mycelial-calcareou 14
Broun Forest soil 14
Xerepts 14
podzol 13
aridisol 13
Leptosol Umbric Petrocalcic Gleyic/Sand 12
unplanted soil 12
drained peat soil 12
typical Clay loamy Fe-leachic-gleyic-stagnic anthrosol 12
Rhizosphere soil of watermelon planted in forest soil 12
Rhizosphere soil of watermelon planted in rice soil 12
Leptosol Umbric Calcaric /Sand 12
Karshner 12
acid red 12
Without pathogens 12
Standard soil Lufa 2.3 12
Rhizosphere soil of cucumber planted in forest soil 12
Soil of apple orchard 12
basalt of volcanic origin 12
sandy-loam from silicate substrate 12
stony clay loam 12
stony silty clay 12
Rhinebeck silt loam 12
Leptosol Umbric Calcaric Nudilithic/Sand 12
Rhizosphere soil of cucumber planted in rice soil 12
Leptosol Umbric Calcaric Gleyic/Sand 12
4 11
Alluvials compact 11
2 11
Orthic Gleysol 11
Fill 10
5 10
Root soil interface 10
Bastsil 10
Upper Scarp Complex 9
NS+Smic+Ni 9
Marine 9
Fernwood (Arenosol) 9
Ferric-Udic Cambisols 9
Griffin (Gleyic Acrisol) 9
Typic Hapludands 9
"ST" 9
Bekenu 9
Merit 9
NS+Smic+Drought 9
Histic Epiaquands 9
Leptosol/Sand 8
Pinedene (Helvic Acrisol) 8
silt loam 8
Clay loam 8
Clay loamy endogleyic-Fe-leachic-stagnic anthrosol 8
Nyalau 8
potting soil 8
moraine 8
Humults 8
Phaeozem Luvic/Loam 8
Organic Soil 8
Peat 7
Rendzina 6
Aquepts 6
Rhizosphere soil of celery planted in rice soil 6
Rhizosphere soil of celery planted in forest soil 6
Poor Lake 6
not collection 6
with F.oxysporum 6
sod podzol 6
Original rice soil 6
Saprists 6
Argids 6
red earth 6
PLcomparison 6
Bath 6
Original forest soil 6
Hudson silt loam 6
Ferric-Ustic Luvisols 6
Podzol 6
Stafford loamy fine sand 6
Houston 6
Olnes 6
sandy 5
furrow soil of potato plant with low common scab severity level 5
silty loam 5
geocaulosphere soil of potato plant with high common scab severity level 5
rhizosphere soil of potato plant with low common scab severity level 5
Anthroposol 5
ultisol 5
andisol 5
Nixon Sandy Loam 5
Aquents 5
rhizosphere soil of potato plant with high common scab severity level 5
root-zone soil of potato plant with high common scab severity level 5
root-zone soil of potato plant with low common scab severity level 5
geocaulosphere soil of potato plant with low common scab severity level 5
Williamson 5
Water 4
Mesic Organic Cryosol 4
eutric endostagnic cambisol 4
n/a 4
gelisol 4
furrow soil of potato plant with high common scab severity level 4
Portneuf silt loam 4
Sandy Loam 4
entisol 4
Albeluvisol 4
gleyed slightly humic 4
Leptosol/ Sand 4
Lordstown 4
Langford 4
deep sandy loam (top soil) 30cm, med-heavy clay (80-100cm) 3
Typic Torriorthent 3
granite 3
Pe+LTNDT N1K1 Field 3
Clay Loam- Clacium Carbonate 3
Typic Vitrandept 3
Pe+LTNDT M1P1 Field 3
LTNDT M1P1 Field 3
Pe+LTNDT N1P2K2 Field 3
Loam over clay over limestone 3
High sand sandy loam over yellow/red clay 3
Loam over clay 3
Loam over red clay 3
Deep Friable Gradational clay loam 3
M 3
Hapludox 3
Entic Cryandept 3
Pe+LTNDT N2P2K2 Lab 3
Bubbly loam 3
Thick sand over clay 3
LTNDT M1P1 Lab 3
Dystric Xerocrept 3
Initial soil, with no fertilization nor chemical nor organic 3
Sandy loam over yellow Pudsolic clay 3
Clay Loam over red clay 3
None 3
Red/brown earth - stone fragments -strong clay over shift 3
Typic Haplohumult 3
alluvium 3
LTNDT N1K1 Field 3
healthy soil 3
LTNDT N1P2K2 Field 3
Meadow dirt- high organic carbon content 3
Red brown earth over red clay 3
Sand over red clay 3
Erie 3
Pe+LTNDT M1P1 Lab 3
Dry soil 3
LTNDT N2P2K2 Lab 3
water control 3
Shallow top soil- red clay/Limestone 3
clay loam over red clay with various calcium carbonate layers 3
Sandy loam over blocky clay 3
Red/Brown earth 3
Sand over yellow/orange clay 3
Sandy alluvial 3
agricultural soil 2
tar sand 2
desert gypsum 2
Mixed Waste Organic Output 2
pine forest 2
Lts 2
Volusia 2
blank 2
spodosol 2
Harper series, thermic Lithic Haplustolls, Mollisol 2
Ornithic Leptosol 2
Kendaia 2
Eckert series, thermic Lithic Haplustolls, Mollisol 2
tundra soil 2
Gray Solodized Solonetz 2
Biochar 2
Real series, thermic Typic Calciustolls, Mollisol 2
db.getCollection("biosample_set").find( { soil_type : { $exists : true } } );

0

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

Environmental package agriculture food-farm environment soil
Structured comment name soil_type_meth soil_type_meth soil_type_meth
Package item soil type method soil type method soil type method
Definition Reference or method used in determining soil series name or other lower-level classification Reference or method used in determining soil series name or other lower-level classification. Reference or method used in determining soil series name or other lower-level classification
Expected value PMID,DOI or url PMID,DOI or url PMID,DOI or url
Value syntax {PMID|DOI|URL} {PMID}|{DOI}|{URL} {PMID}|{DOI}|{URL}
Example   Frederick series; Weikert series  
Requirement M X X
Preferred unit      
Occurrence 1 1 1
MIXS ID MIXS:0000334 MIXS:0000334 MIXS:0000334
value count
Gray 708
parent material 620
USDA taxonomy 555
not applicable 536
not collected 438
NA 373
WRB 353
Canadian System of Soil Classification 290
USDA soil classification 264
USDA Soil Taxonomy system 254
According to soil characteristics 174
FAO 1998 170
- 168
Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung (Ad-hoc-Arbeitsgruppe Boden der Staatlichen Geologischen Dienste und der Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) 120
Webster_silty_clay_loam 120
INTA soil map (http://geointa.inta.gov.ar/visor/?p=model_suelos) 108
missing 101
USDA soil taxonomy 73
World Reference Base system 72
IUSS 72
Web Soil Survey, USDA 61
World Reference Base System 61
USDA 49
soil_type_meth not involve 40
US Taxonomy 33
The Canadian System of Soil Classification, 3rd edition 33
Web of soil survey 32
FAO-WRB 28
more contaminated 27
less contaminated 27
Method described by FAO (2014) 26
Community_P 24
Community_U 24
sand 18
na 18
World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) 16
USDA web soil survey and soil taxonomy 16
Sedimentation 14
Organic Soil 8
NRCS Soil Survey Manual 7
websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx 6
Köhn, M. (1929). Korngrößenbestimmung mittels Pipettanalyse. Tonindustrie-Zeitung, 55:729–731. and Ad-Hoc-AG Boden (2005). Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung 5 (KA5). Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 5 edition. 5
db.getCollection("biosample_set").find( { soil_type_meth : { $exists : true } } );

0

@turbomam turbomam changed the title Submission portal- soil template- soil types Determine if and how various soil type/classification/taxonomy terms will be used in the submission schema May 21, 2023
@turbomam turbomam moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🏗 In progress in SubPort Squad Issues May 21, 2023
@ssarrafan
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding to current sprint per Mark. Need feedback from @mslarae13

@mslarae13
Copy link
Contributor Author

@turbomam is it possible to export these in an excel file so I can look at them side by side?

@turbomam
Copy link
Member

turbomam commented Jun 1, 2023

@mslarae13 you can copy markdown tables from GH issues and paste into Excel and they will look pretty good.

If I need to create some new tables for you, what is it that you want to see side by side?

@mslarae13
Copy link
Contributor Author

mslarae13 commented Jun 2, 2023

Thanks Mark!

I didn't realize this would copy-paste so well.

"Soil taxonomy is a hierarchical soil classification system with six categories, or levels: order, suborder, great group, subgroup, family, and series. Soil taxonomy is a morphogenetic soil classification system using diagnostic horizons and features to infer pathways of soil genesis and formation." & "Soil taxonomy replaced the classification system in the US ... in 1938" - From this paper

Looking at these slots and what people have submitted, here's my conclusions.

1: FAO class is very specific. This should be an enumeration. Taxonomy (The FAO soil map was intended for mapping soils at a continental scale but not at local scale.)
2: local_class and soil_type look like classifications that may or may not be taxonomy.

Looking at GSC

slot description syntax
soil_type Description of the soil type or classification. This field accepts terms under soil (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00001998). Multiple terms can be separated by pipes. "{termLabel} {[termID]}"
fao_class Soil classification from the FAO World Reference Database for Soil Resources. The list can be found at http://www.fao.org/nr/land/sols/soil/wrb-soil-maps/reference-groups enumeration
local_class Soil classification based on local soil classification system {text}

Local and soil type seem to be the same to me and soil type is more structured. I think we should drop local_class. This also allows for international taxonomy / classification since FAO an taxonomy are US specific
I have asked for feedback from ambassadors. I'll reach out to others in my network and report back with some additional thoughts on this before we make a final decision.

Adding to backlog until this is complete.

@ssarrafan
Copy link
Collaborator

Appears to be in progress based on recent comments. Moving to new sprint.

@mslarae13 mslarae13 moved this from In Progress to Todo in 2023 Squad Sprint 12: June 5 - June 16, 2023 Jun 2, 2023
@mslarae13 mslarae13 added the backlog Issue not assigned to a sprint or not completed during a sprint. Needs to be reprioritized. label Jun 2, 2023
@mslarae13 mslarae13 moved this from 🏗 In progress to ❌Blocked in SubPort Squad Issues Jun 2, 2023
@ssarrafan
Copy link
Collaborator

No update this sprint. Removing from sprint. Backlog label was already added 2 weeks ago. Blocked on SubPort board.

@ssarrafan ssarrafan added the unfinished wasn't completed during sprint, should be reprioritized and/or broken down to smaller issues label Jun 16, 2023
@mslarae13
Copy link
Contributor Author

mslarae13 commented Jul 4, 2024

Requirements to unblock:

  • From this comment, link_class_info should be gone, but I still see it in the documentation.
    • Confirm, is it gone?
    • Deprecate it from NMDC documention
  • Should we remove local_class
  • Unclear from MIxS how local_class and soil_type are supposed to be different. Get clarification

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backlog Issue not assigned to a sprint or not completed during a sprint. Needs to be reprioritized. nmdc-schema-mixs-submission unfinished wasn't completed during sprint, should be reprioritized and/or broken down to smaller issues
Projects
Status: ❌Blocked
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants