You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Make isotope_exposure more general and enumerated to match JGI, assuming the chemical that is labeled will be captured somewhere else (chem administration?)
Pros: clear mapping to JGI, clearer metadata in NMDC, will be a closer map to GSC v7 with addition of SIP checklists
Cons: more columns, more slots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd vote for 'Make isotope_exposure more general and enumerated to match JGI, assuming the chemical that is labeled will be captured somewhere else (chem administration?)' since it has more pros that the other option.
The NMDC slot 'isotope_exposure" can be used to inform the JGI template column "Isotope label".
In the JGI template, it's an enumeration (C13, N15, O18, Unlabeled).
NMDC doesn't have an enumeration & it is expected to include the compound that is labeled (13C glucose (C13 glucose), H218O, 15NH4+).
In theory, we can extrapolate the correct JGI enum from what we collection.. but it isn't easy, and it's error prone.
Looking for some comments / feedback on how we should handle this.
@turbomam , @cmungall , @emileyfadrosh , @aclum
Some options:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: