-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
identify additional metadata / configuration data needed for metabolomics including the use of blanks #4
Comments
@mslarae13 could you please help with the necessary metadata definitions? |
@yuricorilo |
@yuricorilo @mslarae13 @dehays I was going to move this to the May sprint since it's not done. Let me know if you're not planning to work on it during May otherwise I'll move it over. |
From: Setareh Sarrafan [email protected] Hi Bin, Is it ok if I move the open workflow related GitHub issues to the May sprint? If there are any that you don't plan to work on in May let me know, or if there are ones that you made some progress and would like to close let me know, otherwise I was planning to move the following to May sprint: Thanks, Setareh On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 1:03 PM Setareh Sarrafan [email protected] wrote: |
@corilo should this issue be closed or moved to the June sprint? |
Moving to June per @yuricorilo on Slack |
Will be closed by @mslarae13 after a meeting tomorrow. |
Proteomics: Agilent tune mix and a complex proteome are used to check the run, but are not used in analyses metabolomics: agilent tune mix, see follow up issuse for confirmation of prep NOM: blanks, FAMES standard or alkane mixer, see follow up issue for confirmation |
@corilo Move this issue to whichever issue queue you deem appropriate.
Once you have defined the necessary metadata / configuration data - there would be nmdc-schema issues to align those needs with changes to the metabolomics metadata specified in the schema
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: