Add Revealer Scientific Camera Adapter

[Ryanyntc2013]

Hello, this is our first time to submit the Micro-Manager plug-in, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me, thank you very much!

[marktsuchida]

@Ryanyntc2013 Thank you for your pull request!

Would you be willing to use LGPL, BSD, MIT, or Apache 2.0 for the license? I'm asking because the Mulan PubL appears to be a strong copyleft license, which would conflict with distributing Micro-Manager builds that include proprietary code. For the same reason we also cannot accept GNU GPL.

Existing device adapters have the above-listed licenses that are permissive (or at most weakly copyleft, as with LGPL), GPL-compatible, Free (by FSF definition), and OSI-approved open source. Licenses would also ideally be on the SPDX list so that we don't have to independently verify the free/open source status. We'd need to have a proper discussion if we are going to use a license that doesn't satisfy these criteria, because it may limit how we and others can use and (re)distribute Micro-Manager as a whole.

Also, I think we would like to separate out the files that belong to your SDK and put those in our private repository of dependencies. The directory in this repo should contain just the Micro-Manager device adapter code (MMSCCam.{h,cpp} if I understand right). This also means that your SDK files (SCApi.h, SCDefines.h, and scsdk.lib, if I understand correctly) can have a proprietary license if you like (but not Mulan PubL or GNU GPL), as long as it doesn't restrict the distribution of software built using them.

[cxylh]

@marktsuchida
Thank you for your reply. We are willing to use LGPL license. In addition, you can separate our SDK files (SCApi.h, SCDefines.h, and scsdk.lib). Do I need to resubmit a commit.