Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: endless matching loop #199
fix: endless matching loop #199
Changes from all commits
c154283
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we should return the error here. But this is also probably fine. Any thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's that way because I wanted to differentiate errors during matching vs errors from the handlers. "matching connection" vs. "handling connection". But I agree it looks bad/wrong.
We could swap the positions. Log "matching connection" in server.go#L168 and "handling connection" in routes.go#L173. Then the
HandlerFunc
inCompile
could return errors directly everywhere.But the logic for only logging with warning level for
ErrDeadlineExceeded
should probably be kept in the compiled function. Otherwise it must be duplicated to all other places that callHandle
on the compiled route. Like the listener wrapper or the subroute handler.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, so it's in a function that acts as a handler representing the entire route, which is both matching and handling. That's a good question, I guess, whether we should treat their errors separately or differently. A matcher should only return an error if a decision (true/false) couldn't be reached; that should be rare, and notable, since it indicates a problem with the connection. Maybe we should treat their errors equally?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delayed response. For now, I would leave it as it is. I think the different messages are useful to differentiate errors during the routing/matching phase and caddy actually knowing what to do with the connection. Since errors during matching are likely caused by clients sending garbage, disconnecting early or configuration problems. But errors during handing likely indicate real problems for real/valid users.