Implement subset of strftime/strptime POSIX standard #29
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| info = result.groupdict() | ||
| date_info_keys = [i[3] for i in parser_spec.get_date_translate_info( | ||
| self.expanded_year_digits)] | ||
| time_info_keys = [i[3] for i in parser_spec.get_time_translate_info()] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i[3] is a bit magical here.
|
Tests OK in my environment. Some minor comments. |
|
Done (and tested). |
matthewrmshin
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2014
Implement subset of strftime/strptime POSIX standard
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This implements a subset of the Python datetime
strftime/strptimefunctionality. Some tokens have not been implemented due to
conflict with ISO 8601 interpretations (e.g. week day (
%w), wherethe strftime (US-derived) week starts on Sunday) or due to
locale/language dependencies.
@matthewrmshin, please review.