Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support account collections for instructions #87

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 23, 2022
Merged

Conversation

thlorenz
Copy link
Contributor

@thlorenz thlorenz commented Sep 22, 2022

Summary

Superseedes #81 (which includes further description)
FIXES: #78

This builds on top of the related PR by @ricardocr987 and adapts mainly how items of account
collections are named.
Instead of just upper-casing them to avoid name clashes the name now is prefixed with the
collection name and suffixed with the account item. This makes them easy to discover on top of
avoiding name clashes.

Sample Completion

The below shows clearly that the account item names help discover accounts by collection easily.

Screen Shot 2022-09-22 at 11 46 13 AM

ricardocr987 and others added 7 commits September 2, 2022 11:02
* master:
  0.16.0
  feat: support sets (#86)
- adding collection name as prefix makes it easier to discover
  collection items via intellisense, i.e. `sourceMarketItemCoinVault`
  as well as making clear where each account item originated from
@thlorenz
Copy link
Contributor Author

thlorenz commented Sep 23, 2022

Hi @ricardocr987 . Just making sure this didn't go unnoticed by accident.
Would like to get this merged so others can use this feature as well.

Please LMK if the changes I made are acceptable.

@ricardocr987
Copy link
Contributor

yep, the code is much cleaner and the solution also suits to me, thank you very much

@thlorenz thlorenz merged commit 1798e6a into master Sep 23, 2022
@thlorenz thlorenz deleted the thlorenz/pr/72 branch September 23, 2022 23:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Exceptional case where the IDL type definition is not met
2 participants