-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 E2E: Remove gomega in LoadBMCConfig() #1806
🌱 E2E: Remove gomega in LoadBMCConfig() #1806
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Huy Mai <[email protected]>
79f06df
to
23246c9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@adilGhaffarDev: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dtantsur The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
A minor PR to not use gomega's
Expect()
inLoadBMCConfig()
.Reason: Using
Expect()
inside the function prevents reusage of the function in locations where ginkgo is not in use (e.g. #1767). This inclusion is unnecessary anyway, andExpect()
should be located in the e2e suite.