enhance(macros/AvailableInWorkers): add "only available in Web Workers" case

[skyclouds2001]

Summary

the {{AvailableInWorkers}} macro that adds a message indicating a feature is available in web workers

in #10029, more cases is supported for the {{AvailableInWorkers}} macro

but there is still some cases that the {{AvailableInWorkers}} macro does not support

like:

• only for Worker (like WorkerLocation WorkerNavigator and so on)

Problem

when working on mdn/content#31675, noticed that there's some cases that {{AvailableInWorkers}} macros can not cover

Solution

the macro's parameter support more available value
seom possible usage like: {{AvailableInWorkers("worker")}}

---

Screenshots

Before

None

After

---

How did you test this change?

Test by hand.

[yin1999]

LGTM for the zh-CN translation 👍

[caugner]

@teoli2003 @bsmth @hamishwillee What do you think about this additional case?

[bsmth]

@teoli2003 @bsmth @hamishwillee What do you think about this additional case?

LGTM, curious what others think. This should be every case covered by now, right?

[hamishwillee]

This makes sense - I am sure there are at least a few worker-only features, in particular around things that have no UI.

This should be every case covered by now, right?

No, about half. The possible cases are all variations of: window, service worker, dedicated worker, shared worker - which is 2^4 = 16 variants.

But I suspect this covers the cases which make sense in the spec for now.

[skyclouds2001]

But I suspect this covers the cases which make sense in the spec for now.

Yes, I think currently this has covered all cases in the spec for now

[caugner]

LGTM, just two nits that I will apply.