feat: Editorial review: Fenced Frames docs

[chrisdavidmills]

Description

#27781 contains the engineering technical review for my work on Fenced Frames docs, which has been completed and approved. Thank you to @gtanzer and others for your thorough and detailed review work.

This is a new PR based on the same branch, which is intended to contain the editorial review for the same work.

---

Background information

Fenced frames are an integral part of Google's privacy sandbox technologies. Many parts of this set are being made available by default in Chrome 115 (depending on a gradual ramp up to 100% of userbase over the 115 release period).

See my research document for more details of exactly what changes are expected in the PR.

Motivation

Additional details

Related issues and pull requests

[bsmth]

Any chance there are SVGs of these files? It's easier for maintenance & keeping bins out of the repo.

[chrisdavidmills]

I wasn't provided with any, sorry. These came from the Chrome dev rel team. I'll ask around.

[bsmth]

Would be awesome, not a blocker 🙏🏻

[bsmth]

@chrisdavidmills I'm done taking a look for now, a couple of comments for your consideration 🙌🏻

[chrisdavidmills]

@chrisdavidmills I'm done taking a look for now, a couple of comments for your consideration 🙌🏻

Thanks so much for the helpful comments, @bsmth! I have responded to all your comments so far.

[bsmth]

Nice, thanks for incorporating the changes. Last thing is the images is there's SVG available, that would be great. Otherwise feel free to merge when you're ready!

Thank you!

See also:

[chrisdavidmills]

Nice, thanks for incorporating the changes. Last thing is the images is there's SVG available, that would be great. Otherwise feel free to merge when you're ready!

Yay, thanks so much @bsmth! I am still chasing SVG images, but I won't block on that.

Thank you!

See also:

Well, y'know, this PR came from the dark days before I promised to limited PR sizes a bit ;-)

[bsmth]

Well, y'know, this PR came from the dark days before I promised to limited PR sizes a bit ;-)

I presume you meant to hit 1337 additions, no more, no less 😄

[chrisdavidmills]

Well, y'know, this PR came from the dark days before I promised to limited PR sizes a bit ;-)

I presume you meant to hit 1337 additions, no more, no less 😄

I did not even notice that; an even cooler PR to land than it was before ;-)