-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add stricter TypeScript type checking
Most of this message is copied from: - mbland/jsdoc-cli-wrapper#21 mbland/jsdoc-cli-wrapper@e0d287d - mbland/rollup-plugin-handlebars-precompiler#7 mbland/rollup-plugin-handlebars-precompiler@eb5b9a8 - mbland/rollup-plugin-handlebars-precompiler#8 mbland/rollup-plugin-handlebars-precompiler@8b36b2a After doing more research, it appears tsconfig.json is more broadly supported by editors and IDEs than jsconfig.json. For example, IntelliJ IDEA/WebStorm won't recognize it unless added to Settings > Editor > File Types > TypeScript. Related changes include: - Fixed the problems with vitest.config.js and ci/vitest.config.js such that the `// @ts-nocheck` directive is no longer necessary. Used `...(configDefaults.coverage.exclude || [])` to avoid type errors due to configDefaults.coverage.exclude potentially being undefined. - Moved a bunch of compiler options from the `pnpm typecheck` script into tsconfig.json. - Added the `rimraf` npm to make sure `pnpm prepack` generates a new `types/` directory without stale content. - Added @types/{jsdom,istanbul-lib-coverage} as production dependencies. - Bumped vitest to 1.2.0. - Set .eslintrc to disable the no-undefined-types rule by extending "plugin:jsdoc/recommended-typescript-flavor-error". This is because the Handlebars types in lib/parser.js weren't trivial to replicate, and TypeScript finds those types just fine. This was based on advice from: > ...the config plugin:jsdoc/recommended-typescript-error should > disable the jsdoc/no-undefined-types rule because TypeScript itself > is responsible for reporting errors about invalid JSDoc types. > > - gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc#888 (comment) And: > If you are not using TypeScript syntax (your source files are still > .js files) but you are using the TypeScript flavor within JSDoc > (i.e., the default "typescript" mode in eslint-plugin-jsdoc) and you > are perhaps using allowJs and checkJs options of TypeScript's > tsconfig.json), you may use: > > ```json > { > "extends": ["plugin:jsdoc/recommended-typescript-flavor"] > } > ``` > > ...or to report with failing errors instead of mere warnings: > > ```json > { > "extends": ["plugin:jsdoc/recommended-typescript-flavor-error"] > } > ``` > > - https://github.com/gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc#eslintrc More background: - https://github.com/gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc/blob/main/docs/rules/no-undefined-types.md - gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc#99 - gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc#1098 - jsdoc/jsdoc#1537 - At the same time, extending "recommended-typescript-flavor-error" required adding the `// eslint-disable-next-line no-unused-vars` directive before each set of imports from lib/types.js. (Or adding `// eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars` on the same line if possible.) - Added 'jsdoc-plugin-typescript' to the build to handle the TypeScript `import().Type` directives. This ended up pulling in the 'es-abstract' module, which blew up the pnpm-lock.yaml file. If I get an itch, I'll implement my own plugin one day and replace it. - Finally, it seems IntelliJ IDEA's JSDoc type checking is stronger than TypeScript and VSCode. Fixed a few JSDoc type parameters to eliminate warnings in IntelliJ as well.
- Loading branch information
Showing
16 changed files
with
771 additions
and
268 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.