-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Predicate call site specific mutations #263
Labels
Comments
backus
changed the title
Predicate call side specific mutations
Predicate call site specific mutations
Oct 10, 2016
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2021
- Adds mutations from predicate-like methods (methods ending in ?) to `true`/`false` * `a.b?` -> `false` * `a.b?` -> `true` - Closes #263
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2021
- Adds mutations from predicate-like methods (methods ending in ?) to `true`/`false` * `a.b?` -> `false` * `a.b?` -> `true` - Closes #263
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2021
- Adds mutations from predicate-like methods (methods ending in ?) to `true`/`false` * `a.b?` -> `false` * `a.b?` -> `true` - Closes #263
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2021
- Adds mutations from predicate-like methods (methods ending in ?) to `true`/`false` * `a.b?` -> `false` * `a.b?` -> `true` - Closes #263
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2021
- Adds mutations from predicate-like methods (methods ending in ?) to `true`/`false` * `a.b?` -> `false` * `a.b?` -> `true` - Closes #263
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 2, 2021
- Adds mutations from predicate-like methods (methods ending in ?) to `true`/`false` * `a.b?` -> `false` * `a.b?` -> `true` - Closes #263
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Rubies convention of postfixing predicate methods with an
?
should allow to add predicate call site specific mutations.true
(already included in other mutation operators)false
(currently not included, we emitnil
already, an explicitfalse
will cover more semantics`).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: