Rollup merge of rust-lang#121561 - jieyouxu:compiletest-directive-typ…

…o-check, r=onur-ozkan

Detect typos for compiletest test directives

Checks directives against a known list of compiletest directives collected during migration from legacy-style compiletest directives. A suggestion for the best matching known directive will be made if an invalid directive is found.

This PR does not attempt to implement checks for Makefile directives because they still have the problem of regular comments and directives sharing the same comment prefix `#`.

Closes rust-lang#83551.

src/tools/compiletest/src/header.rs

@@ -680,7 +680,8 @@ pub fn line_directive<'line>(
 /// This is generated by collecting directives from ui tests and then extracting their directive
 /// names. This is **not** an exhaustive list of all possible directives. Instead, this is a
 /// best-effort approximation for diagnostics.
-const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
+const KNOWN_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
+    // tidy-alphabetical-start
     "assembly-output",
     "aux-build",
     "aux-crate",
@@ -693,6 +694,7 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "check-stdout",
     "check-test-line-numbers-match",
     "compile-flags",
+    "count",
     "dont-check-compiler-stderr",
     "dont-check-compiler-stdout",
     "dont-check-failure-status",
@@ -716,6 +718,7 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "ignore-compare-mode-polonius",
     "ignore-cross-compile",
     "ignore-debug",
+    "ignore-eabi",
     "ignore-emscripten",
     "ignore-endian-big",
     "ignore-freebsd",
@@ -731,14 +734,30 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "ignore-lldb",
     "ignore-llvm-version",
     "ignore-loongarch64",
+    "ignore-macabi",
     "ignore-macos",
+    "ignore-mode-assembly",
+    "ignore-mode-codegen",
+    "ignore-mode-codegen-units",
     "ignore-mode-coverage-map",
     "ignore-mode-coverage-run",
+    "ignore-mode-debuginfo",
+    "ignore-mode-incremental",
+    "ignore-mode-js-doc-test",
+    "ignore-mode-mir-opt",
+    "ignore-mode-pretty",
+    "ignore-mode-run-make",
+    "ignore-mode-run-pass-valgrind",
+    "ignore-mode-rustdoc",
+    "ignore-mode-rustdoc-json",
+    "ignore-mode-ui",
+    "ignore-mode-ui-fulldeps",
     "ignore-msp430",
     "ignore-msvc",
     "ignore-musl",
     "ignore-netbsd",
     "ignore-nightly",
+    "ignore-none",
     "ignore-nto",
     "ignore-nvptx64",
     "ignore-openbsd",
@@ -750,35 +769,47 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "ignore-spirv",
     "ignore-stable",
     "ignore-stage1",
+    "ignore-stage2",
     "ignore-test",
+    "ignore-thumb",
     "ignore-thumbv8m.base-none-eabi",
     "ignore-thumbv8m.main-none-eabi",
+    "ignore-unix",
+    "ignore-unknown",
     "ignore-uwp",
     "ignore-vxworks",
+    "ignore-wasi",
     "ignore-wasm",
     "ignore-wasm32",
     "ignore-wasm32-bare",
+    "ignore-wasm64",
     "ignore-windows",
     "ignore-windows-gnu",
+    "ignore-x32",
     "ignore-x86",
+    "ignore-x86_64",
     "ignore-x86_64-apple-darwin",
+    "ignore-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
     "incremental",
     "known-bug",
     "llvm-cov-flags",
     "min-cdb-version",
     "min-gdb-version",
     "min-lldb-version",
     "min-llvm-version",
+    "min-system-llvm-version",
     "needs-asm-support",
     "needs-dlltool",
     "needs-dynamic-linking",
+    "needs-git-hash",
     "needs-llvm-components",
     "needs-profiler-support",
     "needs-relocation-model-pic",
     "needs-run-enabled",
     "needs-rust-lldb",
     "needs-sanitizer-address",
     "needs-sanitizer-cfi",
+    "needs-sanitizer-dataflow",
     "needs-sanitizer-hwaddress",
     "needs-sanitizer-leak",
     "needs-sanitizer-memory",
@@ -801,6 +832,7 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "only-aarch64",
     "only-arm",
     "only-avr",
+    "only-beta",
     "only-bpf",
     "only-cdb",
     "only-gnu",
@@ -818,13 +850,15 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "only-riscv64",
     "only-sparc",
     "only-sparc64",
+    "only-stable",
     "only-thumb",
     "only-wasm32",
     "only-wasm32-bare",
     "only-windows",
     "only-x86",
     "only-x86_64",
     "only-x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx",
+    "only-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu",
     "only-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc",
     "only-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
     "pp-exact",
@@ -846,6 +880,7 @@ const DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES: &[&str] = &[
     "unit-test",
     "unset-exec-env",
     "unset-rustc-env",
+    // tidy-alphabetical-end
 ];
 
 /// The broken-down contents of a line containing a test header directive,
@@ -876,6 +911,22 @@ struct HeaderLine<'ln> {
     directive: &'ln str,
 }
 
+pub(crate) struct CheckDirectiveResult<'ln> {
+    is_known_directive: bool,
+    directive_name: &'ln str,
+}
+
+// Returns `(is_known_directive, directive_name)`.
+pub(crate) fn check_directive(directive_ln: &str) -> CheckDirectiveResult<'_> {
+    let directive_name =
+        directive_ln.split_once([':', ' ']).map(|(pre, _)| pre).unwrap_or(directive_ln);
+
+    CheckDirectiveResult {
+        is_known_directive: KNOWN_DIRECTIVE_NAMES.contains(&directive_name),
+        directive_name: directive_ln,
+    }
+}
+
 fn iter_header(
     mode: Mode,
     _suite: &str,
@@ -915,6 +966,7 @@ fn iter_header(
     let mut ln = String::new();
     let mut line_number = 0;
 
+    // Match on error annotations like `//~ERROR`.
     static REVISION_MAGIC_COMMENT_RE: Lazy<Regex> =
         Lazy::new(|| Regex::new("//(\\[.*\\])?~.*").unwrap());
 
@@ -933,9 +985,38 @@ fn iter_header(
         if ln.starts_with("fn") || ln.starts_with("mod") {
             return;
 
-        // First try to accept `ui_test` style comments
-        } else if let Some((header_revision, directive)) = line_directive(comment, ln) {
-            it(HeaderLine { line_number, original_line, header_revision, directive });
+        // First try to accept `ui_test` style comments (`//@`)
+        } else if let Some((header_revision, non_revisioned_directive_line)) =
+            line_directive(comment, ln)
+        {
+            // Perform unknown directive check on Rust files.
+            if testfile.extension().map(|e| e == "rs").unwrap_or(false) {
+                let directive_ln = non_revisioned_directive_line.trim();
+
+                let CheckDirectiveResult { is_known_directive, .. } = check_directive(directive_ln);
+
+                if !is_known_directive {
+                    *poisoned = true;
+
+                    eprintln!(
+                        "error: detected unknown compiletest test directive `{}` in {}:{}",
+                        directive_ln,
+                        testfile.display(),
+                        line_number,
+                    );
+
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+
+            it(HeaderLine {
+                line_number,
+                original_line,
+                header_revision,
+                directive: non_revisioned_directive_line,
+            });
+        // Then we try to check for legacy-style candidates, which are not the magic ~ERROR family
+        // error annotations.
         } else if !REVISION_MAGIC_COMMENT_RE.is_match(ln) {
             let Some((_, rest)) = line_directive("//", ln) else {
                 continue;
@@ -949,34 +1030,18 @@ fn iter_header(
 
             let rest = rest.trim_start();
 
-            for candidate in DIAGNOSTICS_DIRECTIVE_NAMES.iter() {
-                if rest.starts_with(candidate) {
-                    let Some(prefix_removed) = rest.strip_prefix(candidate) else {
-                        // We have a comment that's *successfully* parsed as an legacy-style
-                        // directive. We emit an error here to warn the user.
-                        *poisoned = true;
-                        eprintln!(
-                            "error: detected legacy-style directives in compiletest test: {}:{}, please use `ui_test`-style directives `//@` instead:{:#?}",
-                            testfile.display(),
-                            line_number,
-                            line_directive("//", ln),
-                        );
-                        return;
-                    };
+            let CheckDirectiveResult { is_known_directive, directive_name } = check_directive(rest);
 
-                    if prefix_removed.starts_with([' ', ':']) {
-                        // We have a comment that's *successfully* parsed as an legacy-style
-                        // directive. We emit an error here to warn the user.
-                        *poisoned = true;
-                        eprintln!(
-                            "error: detected legacy-style directives in compiletest test: {}:{}, please use `ui_test`-style directives `//@` instead:{:#?}",
-                            testfile.display(),
-                            line_number,
-                            line_directive("//", ln),
-                        );
-                        return;
-                    }
-                }
+            if is_known_directive {
+                *poisoned = true;
+                eprintln!(
+                    "error: detected legacy-style directive {} in compiletest test: {}:{}, please use `ui_test`-style directives `//@` instead: {:#?}",
+                    directive_name,
+                    testfile.display(),
+                    line_number,
+                    line_directive("//", ln),
+                );
+                return;
             }
         }
     }

src/tools/compiletest/src/header/test-auxillary/error_annotation.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+//@ check-pass
+
+//~ HELP
+fn main() {} //~ERROR
+//~^ ERROR
+//~| ERROR

src/tools/compiletest/src/header/test-auxillary/known_directive.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+//! ignore-wasm
+//@ ignore-wasm
+//@ check-pass
+// regular comment

src/tools/compiletest/src/header/test-auxillary/known_legacy_directive.rs

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+// ignore-wasm

src/tools/compiletest/src/header/test-auxillary/not_rs.Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# ignore-owo

src/tools/compiletest/src/header/test-auxillary/unknown_directive.rs

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+//@ needs-headpat

src/tools/compiletest/src/header/tests.rs

@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ use std::str::FromStr;
 use crate::common::{Config, Debugger, Mode};
 use crate::header::{parse_normalization_string, EarlyProps, HeadersCache};
 
+use super::iter_header;
+
 fn make_test_description<R: Read>(
     config: &Config,
     name: test::TestName,
@@ -612,3 +614,63 @@ fn threads_support() {
         assert_eq!(check_ignore(&config, "//@ needs-threads"), !has_threads)
     }
 }
+
+fn run_path(poisoned: &mut bool, path: &Path, buf: &[u8]) {
+    let rdr = std::io::Cursor::new(&buf);
+    iter_header(Mode::Ui, "ui", poisoned, path, rdr, &mut |_| {});
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_unknown_directive_check() {
+    let mut poisoned = false;
+    run_path(
+        &mut poisoned,
+        Path::new("a.rs"),
+        include_bytes!("./test-auxillary/unknown_directive.rs"),
+    );
+    assert!(poisoned);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_known_legacy_directive_check() {
+    let mut poisoned = false;
+    run_path(
+        &mut poisoned,
+        Path::new("a.rs"),
+        include_bytes!("./test-auxillary/known_legacy_directive.rs"),
+    );
+    assert!(poisoned);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_known_directive_check_no_error() {
+    let mut poisoned = false;
+    run_path(
+        &mut poisoned,
+        Path::new("a.rs"),
+        include_bytes!("./test-auxillary/known_directive.rs"),
+    );
+    assert!(!poisoned);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_error_annotation_no_error() {
+    let mut poisoned = false;
+    run_path(
+        &mut poisoned,
+        Path::new("a.rs"),
+        include_bytes!("./test-auxillary/error_annotation.rs"),
+    );
+    assert!(!poisoned);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_non_rs_unknown_directive_not_checked() {
+    let mut poisoned = false;
+    run_path(
+        &mut poisoned,
+        Path::new("a.Makefile"),
+        include_bytes!("./test-auxillary/not_rs.Makefile"),
+    );
+    assert!(!poisoned);
+}

tests/ui/borrowck/two-phase-reservation-sharing-interference.rs

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 // The nll_beyond revision is disabled due to missing support from two-phase beyond autorefs
 //@[nll_beyond]compile-flags: -Z two-phase-beyond-autoref
-//[nll_beyond]should-fail
+//@[nll_beyond]should-fail
 
 // This is a corner case that the current implementation is (probably)
 // treating more conservatively than is necessary. But it also does