Revert "[GH-304] Update logic to post meeting link in thread when a thread is open in RHS" #329
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…d when a thread is open in RHS (mattermost#323)" This reverts commit 18da1f1.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #329 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 18.86% 18.86%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 1479 1479
=======================================
Hits 279 279
Misses 1149 1149
Partials 51 51 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
mickmister
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2023
|
@mickmister Do we need a QA review on this PR? Or we can merge it? |
|
@raghavaggarwal2308 I think we can merge. It needs another merge of master |
avas27JTG
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverting on the basis of discussion on #323