-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 1.6.2 #292
Release 1.6.2 #292
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-1.6.2 #292 +/- ##
=================================================
+ Coverage 21.89% 23.68% +1.78%
=================================================
Files 8 9 +1
Lines 877 1157 +280
=================================================
+ Hits 192 274 +82
- Misses 641 834 +193
- Partials 44 49 +5
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
* move webhook handlers to its own file * implement webhook validation * lint * return useful error message * document usage of zoom's webhook secret * PR feedback * rename methods for readability * add todo comment --------- Co-authored-by: Mattermost Build <[email protected]>
Why this PR has more changes than the usual bumping of the version? |
@larkox If we were releasing off of master, we would just be bumping the version and nothing else, but we are instead creating a dot release off of the previous release to minimize the changes and testing required for this release. Having all of this in the same PR lets us see what we're releasing, and gives @DHaussermann a specific build to use for testing. There are some changes necessary for CI here as well. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#294 needs to be merged first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should #294 get cherry-picked into the branch?
@DHaussermann This PR is ready for QA review. Note that it essentially contains only the webhook validation fix |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and passed
- Ensured webhook validation is working
- Webhook documentation is updated for new value
- Smoke tested the plugin
- Start and stop a meeting
- Use slash command as well as icon
- End meeting and ensure the post is updated by the webhook with details
- Collision detection is working to prevent duplicate meeting starts
An issue was found with webhook secret that is not new in this release. Created #296 to address it.
LGTM!
Summary
Ticket Link