fix(en): more correct fees algorithm for external-node #3487
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
perekopskiy
reviewed
Jan 16, 2025
itegulov
reviewed
Jan 17, 2025
| params.conversion_ratio(), | ||
| )); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do we need all of this logic? Can't we just override get_batch_fee_input_scaled instead and return *self.main_node_batch_fee_input.read().unwrap() there? EN's scaling factor will be ignored but arguably this logic is not designed well in general (i.e. is there a reason to scale gas price differently on EN?). Also, fn get_fee_model_params(&self) -> FeeParams being a part of the base trait is strange too, it's more like an implementation detail for half of the implementations.
Co-authored-by: Daniyar Itegulov <[email protected]>
4 tasks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
## What ❔ Alternative to #3487 Before this PR EN based its gas pricing solely on main node's fee params which are based on immediate market conditions and not representative of the open batch's fee input. This is a problem on environments with long-running batches. This PR makes EN fetch main node's batch fee input along with fee params and report fetched batch fee input from its fee input provider. ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev lint`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.