Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC4210: Remove legacy mentions #4210

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tulir
Copy link
Member

@tulir tulir commented Oct 3, 2024

Signed-off-by: Tulir Asokan <[email protected]>
@tulir tulir added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Oct 3, 2024
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# MSC4210: Remove legacy mentions
Matrix v1.7 introduced intentional mentions, where events list users they
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for writing this! Any idea if most clients use this now?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Elements do, not sure about others, should probably find out and make a list 🤔

proposals/4210-remove-legacy-mentions.md Show resolved Hide resolved
proposals/4210-remove-legacy-mentions.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API hacktoberfest-accepted implementation-needs-checking The MSC has an implementation, but the SCT has not yet checked it. kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants