Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add permalink routing through ?via parameters on matrix.to URIs #1955

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 8, 2019

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

Spec for MSC1704

Reference implementations:

The only deviation from the original MSC is the recommendation for which servers to pick. The original MSC failed to consider server ACLs and IP addresses correctly, and during implementation it was realized that both of these cases should be handled. The core principles of the original MSC are left unaltered.

Spec for [MSC1704](#1704)

Reference implementations:
* Original: matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk#2250
* Modern recommendations: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk/blob/2ca281f6b7b735bc96945370584c5cb1b5f7e1f1/src/matrix-to.js#L29-L70

The only deviation from the original MSC is the recommendation for which servers to pick. The original MSC failed to consider server ACLs and IP addresses correctly, and during implementation it was realized that both of these cases should be handled. The core principles of the original MSC are left unaltered.
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

As a point of interest: I've personally seen less complaints about rooms being inaccessible since the change landed in Riot and adopted by more and more users. The implementation seems to work well enough as a stop gap for https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1579, which is still mentioned in the spec itself as there's room for improvement.

@turt2live turt2live requested a review from a team April 5, 2019 22:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants