refactor(send queue): use a specialized mutex for locking access to the state store and being_sent
#4268
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was an implicit relationship that the
being_sent
lock needed to be taken in order to do non-atomic state store operations. With the change from this commit, the relationship is now more explicit: to get a handle to the state store, or being_sent, you have to obtain aStoreLockGuard
by locking against the store itself. TheWeakClient
isn't stored in the QueueStorage data structure itself, so it's the only way to get adyn StateStore
from theQueueStorage
.