This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 16, 2021. It is now read-only.
Make all largeop movablelimits #18
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
22 of the largeops don't have movablelimits. This commit make them movablelimits for consistency with the other largeop. w3c/mathml#176
NSoiffer
suggested changes
May 11, 2020
|
This is done by 7d89ccf So abandoning this. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
22 of the largeops don't have movablelimits.
This commit make them movablelimits for consistency with the other largeop.
w3c/mathml#176
Please take a look.
Currently, there are three categories of largeop:
Some integrals are in category 1. and 3. but it's not clear to me what is the rationale for that. This PR merges 1. into 3.
BTW I'm also not sure whether special spacing is necessary for category 2. ; but I guess this should be a different PR / discussion.