-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
extension theorem #395
extension theorem #395
Conversation
54e930b
to
d090e44
Compare
d090e44
to
0ae192d
Compare
theories/measure.v
Outdated
\sum_(i <oo | P i) (A i + (e%:nngnum / (2 ^ i)%:R)%:E) <= | ||
\sum_(i <oo | P i) A i + (2 * e%:nngnum)%:E. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would
\sum_(i <oo | P i) (A i + (e%:nngnum / (2 ^ i)%:R)%:E) <= | |
\sum_(i <oo | P i) A i + (2 * e%:nngnum)%:E. | |
\sum_(i <oo | P i) (A i + (e%:nngnum / (2 ^ i.+1)%:R)%:E) <= | |
\sum_(i <oo | P i) A i + e%:nngnum%:E. |
be more practical by any chance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
possibly with e : \bar R
such that 0 <= e
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
be more practical by any chance?
It seems to shorten a bit the proofs where it is used (one occurrence in measure.v and another in measure_wip.v not commited yet). NB: the commit in question: b22e2ce
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
possibly with
e : \bar R
such that0 <= e
?
Is it ok to issue and wait for PR #403 to check this one?
0ae192d
to
6907c4e
Compare
- from PR #395 (in progress)
6907c4e
to
d246dce
Compare
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR math-comp#395 (in progress)
d246dce
to
28dd1f9
Compare
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- build an outer measure out of a measure over a ring of sets
- for the CI
28dd1f9
to
57425d5
Compare
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
- from PR #395 (in progress)
Extracted from PR #371
TODO: issue about the epsilon trick lemma, see below