Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse datetime with dateutil #741

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2022
Merged

Parse datetime with dateutil #741

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2022

Conversation

munrojm
Copy link
Member

@munrojm munrojm commented Nov 1, 2022

Switch to parsing datetime strings with dateutil.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 88.38% // Head: 88.44% // Increases project coverage by +0.05% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (c9fbed0) compared to base (4f5d22c).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #741      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.38%   88.44%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        3126     3124       -2     
==========================================
  Hits         2763     2763              
+ Misses        363      361       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/maggma/utils.py 95.72% <100.00%> (+1.60%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@munrojm munrojm merged commit ef3835d into main Nov 1, 2022
@munrojm munrojm deleted the add_dateutil branch November 1, 2022 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant