Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build(catalog): re-enable catalog typechecking #4488

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

e111077
Copy link
Contributor

@e111077 e111077 commented Jun 22, 2023

This enables typechecking on the catalog so that we catch type build issues in CI next time. Type issues didn't break before since we run our code through esbuild, and it was disabled because of some weird 11ty issues that are fixed in this CL

This should prevent issues like b/288481318 from passing by again

Depends on #4489 to merge first

@e111077 e111077 force-pushed the enable-catalog-typechecking branch 2 times, most recently from 6f93206 to 18bd1d0 Compare June 22, 2023 22:51
@e111077 e111077 marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2023 22:51
@e111077 e111077 requested review from AndrewJakubowicz and asyncLiz and removed request for AndrewJakubowicz and asyncLiz June 22, 2023 22:51
@e111077 e111077 marked this pull request as draft June 22, 2023 22:53
This enables typechecking on the catalog so that we catch type build issues in CI next time. Type issues didn't break before since we run our code through esbuild, and it was disabled because of some weird 11ty issues that are fixed in this CL
@e111077 e111077 force-pushed the enable-catalog-typechecking branch from 18bd1d0 to 07668e6 Compare June 22, 2023 23:00
@e111077 e111077 marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2023 23:02
@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit cf5d893 into main Jun 23, 2023
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the enable-catalog-typechecking branch June 23, 2023 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants