-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: outside contributions #441
Conversation
So there's good news and bad news. 👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there. 😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request. Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the |
CLAs look good, thanks! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## rc7.0 #441 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.29% 96.29%
=======================================
Files 56 56
Lines 1914 1914
Branches 228 228
=======================================
Hits 1843 1843
Misses 71 71 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
docs/contributions/README.md
Outdated
|
||
### Process | ||
|
||
Before opening a PR, it should be up to date with targeted release (rc<release_number> ie. rc7.0, rc8.0, etc.). In most cases it will never be branched from _master_. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should add 0.
in front of the versions in the branch name moving forward, like rc0.7.0
, rc0.8.0
.
So it's not confusing if we ever release 1.0.0
lol 😱
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ya true - just thought it was easier to type lol
docs/contributions/README.md
Outdated
|
||
``` | ||
# for a fix to an issue | ||
fix(foo): Short description of fix |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replace foo
with component-name
. Here and 2 below
|
||
Please refer to [screenshot tests](../screnshot-tests.md). | ||
|
||
## Unit Tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a section for running lint. Or include a note at the top that tells people to just run npm test
for all tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah! ya thank you
fixes #440