Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update description of JVM identification and Special initialization conditions #256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Update description of JVM identification and Special initialization conditions #256

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

masesdevelopers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Try to describe better how to solve the conditions reported in #255

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Oct 9, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers self-assigned this Oct 9, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers merged commit 683d9ee into masesgroup:master Oct 9, 2023
7 checks passed
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers deleted the 255-missing-java-key-in-registry-couldnt-find-java-installed-on-the-machine branch October 9, 2023 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant