Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update behavior of auto generation of listeners #220

Conversation

masesdevelopers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

JNetReflector now uses both parameters count and the index of method found. Meanwhile it is fixed a wrong default method association

Related Issue

Closed #219

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request JNet JNet related issue JNetReflector JNetReflector related issue labels Oct 18, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers self-assigned this Oct 18, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers merged commit acc33d3 into masesgroup:master Oct 18, 2023
7 checks passed
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers deleted the 219-current-behavior-of-auto-generation-of-listeners-done-from-jnetreflector-creates-name-clash-using-only-the-number-of-parameters branch October 18, 2023 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request JNet JNet related issue JNetReflector JNetReflector related issue
Projects
None yet
1 participant