Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TypeScript] Make types more strict in ra-core, part II #9743

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

fzaninotto
Copy link
Member

@fzaninotto fzaninotto commented Mar 25, 2024

With strictNullChecks turned on, this PR reduces TS compilation errors on ra-core from 180 to 60 (-67%)

Refs #9622
Follows #9644, #9741

Page Contexts Are Now Types Instead of Interfaces

The return type of page controllers is now a type. If you were using an interface extending one of:

  • ListControllerResult,
  • InfiniteListControllerResult,
  • EditControllerResult,
  • ShowControllerResult, or
  • CreateControllerResult,

you'll have to change it to a type:

import { ListControllerResult } from 'react-admin';

-interface MyListControllerResult extends ListControllerResult {
+type MyListControllerResult = ListControllerResult & {
    customProp: string;
};

TypeScript: Stronger Types For Page Contexts

The return type of page context hooks is now smarter. This concerns the following hooks:

  • useListContext,
  • useEditContext,
  • useShowContext, and
  • useCreateContext

Depending on the fetch status of the data, the type of the data, error, and isPending properties will be more precise:

  • Loading: { data: undefined, error: undefined, isPending: true }
  • Success: { data: <Data>, error: undefined, isPending: false }
  • Error: { data: undefined, error: <Error>, isPending: false }
  • Error After Refetch: { data: <Data>, error: <Error>, isPending: false }

This means that TypeScript may complain if you use the data property without checking if it's defined first. You'll have to update your code to handle the different states:

const MyCustomList = () => {
    const { data, error, isPending } = useListContext();
    if (isPending) return <Loading />;
+   if (error) return <Error />;
    return (
        <ul>
            {data.map(record => (
                <li key={record.id}>{record.name}</li>
            ))}
        </ul>
    );
};

Besides, these hooks will now throw an error when called outside of a page context. This means that you can't use them in a custom component that is not a child of a <List>, <ListBase>, <Edit>, <EditBase>, <Show>, <ShowBase>, <Create>, or <CreateBase> component.

ListControllerResult {
children: ReactElement;
}
export type ReferenceManyFieldViewProps = Omit<
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

breaking change - this is now a type instead of an interface

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see a case where this type could be used, so I'll skip it for the upgrade guide.

showFilter: null,
total: null,
});
export const ListContext = createContext<ListControllerResult | null>(null);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having a default value would force choosing between the pending/error/success case, which doesn't make sense e.g. when using <Datagrid> outside of a ListContext but with a data prop.

On the other hand, using a null default value should mean that useListContext returns ListControllerResult | null, but for some reason the typeScript inference sees the return value as ListControllerResult , even without return type annotation.

This is convenient, because the alternative is to turn the return type of useListContext as Partial< ListControllerResult>, which loses in the process the union between loading/error/success types. Or we could have two hooks:

  • one that throws if there is no context, but always returns a ListControllerResult
  • the other that doesn't throw but returns a Partial< ListControllerResult>, forcing a lot more runtime checks.

Having two hooks seems too complex, so let's keep the code as is for now.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There aren't many components that actually need the prop fallback: Datagrid, SingleFieldList, and SimpleList. I ended up making a second hook especially for these ones. This allows me to throw an error whenever a useXXXController hook is invoked outside of a XXXContext, and ensure that the types are correct when reading the context with these hooks.

@@ -24,7 +19,7 @@ export const BulkActionsToolbar = (props: BulkActionsToolbarProps) => {
className,
...rest
} = props;
const { selectedIds = [], onUnselectItems } = useListContext(props);
const { selectedIds = [], onUnselectItems } = useListContext();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that a standalone <Datagrid> with bulkActionToolbars not set to false will now fail loudly, wit han exception from useListContext. But it's better than before, because <Datagrid> only used to pass the selectedIds to the BulkActionToolbar, which didn't let the user select or unselect rows. I modified the doc to make it obvious that if you want bulk actions with a standalone Datagrid, you'll have to provide a context using useList.

@fzaninotto fzaninotto added RFR Ready For Review and removed WIP Work In Progress labels Mar 27, 2024
@fzaninotto
Copy link
Member Author

Switching to RFR

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ export const BulkDeleteWithConfirmButton = (
...rest
} = props;
const { meta: mutationMeta, ...otherMutationOptions } = mutationOptions;
const { selectedIds, onUnselectItems } = useListContext(props);
const { selectedIds, onUnselectItems } = useListContext();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it call useListContextWithProps? It seems we loose the ability to override through props as before. Same for all the other UI components

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're right, but I don't see any use case for overriding the selectedIds on this one.

Copy link
Collaborator

@djhi djhi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFR Ready For Review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants