Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Doc] Improve usage examples for <ReferenceInput> and <ReferenceArrayInput> #8821

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 12, 2023

Conversation

fzaninotto
Copy link
Member

@fzaninotto fzaninotto commented Apr 9, 2023

Problem

For <SelectInput> and other selection inputs, we document fetching related records by advertising the solution ("using in <ReferenceInput> rather than the problem ("Fetching choices").

As a consequence, newcomers struggle to understand that ReferenceInput thing.

Solution

Write the doc the other way around.

@fzaninotto fzaninotto added the RFR Ready For Review label Apr 9, 2023
@fzaninotto fzaninotto added WIP Work In Progress and removed RFR Ready For Review labels Apr 10, 2023
@fzaninotto
Copy link
Member Author

Switching to RFR

WiXSL

This comment was marked as duplicate.

docs/AutocompleteInput.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@WiXSL WiXSL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are several files that make reference to the anchor #using-in-a-referenceinput, but there is no such anchor

Co-authored-by: Aníbal Svarcas <[email protected]>
docs/RadioButtonGroupInput.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@slax57 slax57 added this to the 4.9.3 milestone Apr 12, 2023
@slax57 slax57 merged commit 318cc33 into master Apr 12, 2023
@slax57 slax57 deleted the doc-referenceinput branch April 12, 2023 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation RFR Ready For Review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants