feat: add minimal sync API support

[JounQin]

@YusukeHirao

That's all my need now!

It's just working

https://github.com/rx-ts/markuplint-sync/pull/1/files#diff-2d7099151b743450eb9f3f7dc0c1cf18dd82a7aae5a1814f9e22f7b785eec873
https://github.com/rx-ts/markuplint-sync/pull/1/files#diff-e4cc8197c89ac192fd923b66694d6e3556374fef601b5c6b03dc353d355c9227

[JounQin]

I'm patching MLRule at https://github.com/rx-ts/markuplint-sync/pull/1/files#diff-1723758355313af6ffa725427997e9f6201b45d62be77ddce8d045585ec01e96, it's a little bit hacky.

If you agree to merge it into this PR, that would be better. If not, I'll just patch as-is.

[YusukeHirao]

@JounQin

You really need to change just only walk and walkOn even if you fork that, don't you?

[JounQin]

@YusukeHirao

I'm not forking markuplint but extending and patching. (with class X extends Y, and Object.defineProperty(M.prototype, x, {value: yyy}))

First, the current rules must be changed to be sync compatible to run, so I change @markuplint/rules, walker of them.

Second, MLRule.create is used in @markuplint/rules to create rules, so I cannot extend MLRule but patching it, so I expose getter for #v and #f to reuse it in patching.

Last not least, if we support sync rule, the current walk and walkOn is not correct at #157 (comment), so I change it, and it is compatible with current async rules of course(rule-textlint test cases proofs.)

So, is there any unexpected changes here for you?

[JounQin]

@YusukeHirao Any luck to merge and release then? markuplint-sync is ready now.

[YusukeHirao]

@JounQin

Thank you for everything.

First, I will prerelease that added @dev tag.
I want to release the public version after I resolve some issues.

[JounQin]

First, I will prerelease that added @dev tag.

Thank you, that would be appreciated.

I want to release the public version after I resolve some issues.

Looking forward it.

[YusukeHirao]

@JounQin

Sorry, I didn't the tagged prerelease.
But I released it as canary.

Successfully published:

• [email protected]+c47a79f
• @markuplint/[email protected]+c47a79f
• @markuplint/[email protected]+c47a79f
• @markuplint/[email protected]+c47a79f
• @markuplint/[email protected]+c47a79f
• @markuplint/[email protected]+c47a79f

[JounQin]

That's OK, it should be same for markuplint-sync for now.