-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace deconvolutional upsampling in decoder with nearest upsampling plus convs #44
Comments
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 22, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2018
daniel-j-h
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2018
bkowshik
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 3, 2018
This landed with #46. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
At the moment we upsample with a scaling factor of two in the decoder by using deconvolutions (transposed convolutions). Instead we should use the following simpler approach which should work just as well an not have the segmentation mask checker board problem:
We could also switch the order first doing convolution on the low-res feature maps in case we need to save some memory. But I don't think that's a constraint we have right now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: