Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

support custom AWS.Config() instead of requiring parameters be manually mapped #133

Open
knksmith57 opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

support custom AWS.Config() instead of requiring parameters be manually mapped #133

knksmith57 opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@knksmith57
Copy link

The Dyno factory only supports a small subset of the available AWS configuration options because it plucks certain properties from the options hash and passes them into the AWS.DynamoDB constructor.

This is problematic for consumers wishing to have fine-grain control over the behavior of the AWS SDK.

Dyno should support using a custom AWS.Config instance to configure the AWS SDK.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@knksmith57