Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue #14 #15

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 25, 2016
Merged

Fix issue #14 #15

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 25, 2016

Conversation

lelit
Copy link
Contributor

@lelit lelit commented Apr 23, 2016

No description provided.

@lelit
Copy link
Contributor Author

lelit commented Apr 23, 2016

@magmax, the failure is not related to my changes, is this acceptable or should I take care of those too?

@magmax
Copy link
Owner

magmax commented Apr 23, 2016

Lovely new flakes...

It should be fixed at master. Could you kindly rebase origin/master?

lelit added 3 commits April 23, 2016 21:45
This allow passing a set of answers to override the default values of
the questions.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 96.306% when pulling a7b73e1 on lelit:master into 9252639 on magmax:master.

@lelit
Copy link
Contributor Author

lelit commented Apr 23, 2016

Ok, done! I think that the coverage decrease is not my fault... ;-)

@magmax magmax merged commit 34a3583 into magmax:master Apr 25, 2016
@magmax
Copy link
Owner

magmax commented Apr 25, 2016

The coverage decrease is your fault, due to the refactor on password.py: less code tested against non-tested (because it is being reused).

Anyway, codecoverage should be taken in mind carefully and -0.2 is noting :)

@lelit
Copy link
Contributor Author

lelit commented Apr 25, 2016

Thank you Miguel.
WRT to the coverage: I'm afraid fail to understand the coverage report then: it shows that the _password.py is 100% covered, so how can that decrease the overall status?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants