-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove zend json from customer data #10259
Merged
magento-team
merged 5 commits into
magento:develop
from
dmanners:remove-zend-json-from-customer-data
Jul 19, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2e72fb0
Remove Zend_Json call from js/customer-data/invalidation-rules.phtml
dmanners 0a7ee59
Replace the usage of the depricated \Magento\Framework\Json\EncoderIn…
dmanners eaad78c
Update the CustomerScopeData changes to use serializer to fit with Bi…
dmanners 5568b8d
Add back in the type for the $jsonEncoder object injected into Custom…
dmanners 31764a5
Add back in the mock of the jsonEncoder to the test case
dmanners File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still... What are the advantages compared to
echo json_encode($block->getInvalidationRules();
in template? As to me encoding is purely responsibility of template.Another thing which just came to my mind: do we have a recommendation to leave JS component declaration in templates? Thus they may be overridden more easily, without touching PHP classes. At least I was not able to find similar occurrence of
/js/
or'*'
in*.php
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about the leaving of the js declaration in the templates. Though to me this feels like config and to have to change a full template to change the config feels odd.
With regards to the
json_encode
in the template I dont agree here. I feel that we should either be using json_encode everywhere or wrap it's usage across the system, which would include templates. This way if a mass change is needed it is easier to manage and roll out.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have no idea which kind of mass change could it be :D
Ok, I see your point, you want to encapsulate serializer logic in block class and don't make template aware of it (while it does
escapeHtml
and other similar things). There is nothing to discuss here, let's wait for the feedback from Oleksii and then maybe put a common recommendation for such situation somewhere to keep the code consistent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah something like
escapeHtml
would be a nice option here also thought about that. It's above this PR but I think some "common" way to do this through templates would be amazing.