Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pull vellum with pooling fixes #880

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2018
Merged

Conversation

prateek
Copy link
Collaborator

@prateek prateek commented Sep 4, 2018

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@benraskin92 benraskin92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #880 into master will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #880     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   78.43%   78.34%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         391      391             
  Lines       33267    33267             
=========================================
- Hits        26094    26063     -31     
- Misses       5382     5407     +25     
- Partials     1791     1797      +6
Flag Coverage Δ
#dbnode 81.34% <ø> (-0.1%) ⬇️
#m3ninx 71.99% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#query 67.47% <ø> (-0.13%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 581d74e...7abd8b1. Read the comment docs.

@prateek prateek merged commit b8d5a48 into master Sep 4, 2018
@prateek prateek deleted the prateek/m3ninx/vellum-pooling branch September 4, 2018 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants