Remove redundant checks whereever possible

[jkrimmer]

Take care of #46 .

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (d987944) to head (24e280e).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 24e280e differs from pull request most recent head a73b437

Please upload reports for the commit a73b437 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #47      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.94%   89.77%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         358      352       -6     
==========================================
- Hits          322      316       -6     
  Misses         36       36              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ahbarnett]

I am all in favor of simpler code, removing redundancy. I haven't tested this one.

[ahbarnett]

FWIW I tested your 3.1.0 now on master, and the tests and examples are all good on my julia 1.7 linux laptop. Thanks for that! Alex

[ludvigak]

Sure, no reason not to simplify. Seems to be a merge conflict at the moment though

[jkrimmer]

Good point, I will work on the conflicts later today

[ludvigak]

Merging stale PR