You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ive noticed that ina few rare cases in some apache logs I have analysed there log lines when the response code field is "-" , the HTTPD grok pattern expects it always to be %{NUMBER}. Not sure if it should be changed upstream to (?:%{NUMBER}|-), or if it is deemed so rare its a non issue
Ive noticed that ina few rare cases in some apache logs I have analysed there log lines when the response code field is "-" , the HTTPD grok pattern expects it always to be %{NUMBER}. Not sure if it should be changed upstream to (?:%{NUMBER}|-), or if it is deemed so rare its a non issue
Logstash 6.0 (deb)
Log Line
210.79.229.15 - - [28/Jan/2014:08:59:29 -0600] "GET /template/js/javascript.js?dc=52e7c5c2c4fcc HTTP/1.0" - 0 "REF" "UA"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: