-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update references to piet-gpu where it makes sense #240
Conversation
canadaduane
commented
Jan 7, 2023
- Update "piet-gpu authors" to "vello authors"
- Update comments
- Update example text: "hello piet-gpu text" => "hello vello text"
- Preserve vision.md but add explanation to connect "vello" to "piet-gpu"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good; I've been meaning to do this! A few thoughts where details have been lost here.
BTW I love "hello vello". Reminds me of "mellow yellow" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQNBQI3UDag |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thanks! Just a couple missed details
Removing the other authors isn't critical
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ members = ["examples/with_winit", "examples/with_bevy", "examples/run_wasm"] | |||
[workspace.package] | |||
edition = "2021" | |||
version = "0.1.0" | |||
authors = ["piet-gpu developers"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are authors also set elsewhere, which should probably also be removed
That is at least further down this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I removed the authors key in the [package] section, which is I think what you mean.
@raphlinus just want to get your thoughts/assent on removing the authors. Reasoning is in #240 (comment). Once we have that, I'll do final cleanup and merge. |
Yup if the RFC says it's not useful, fine with me. I don't believe it's needed. Thanks both of you for refining this! |
Thanks for this! |