add to column selection example

[dougbrn]

Change Description

• My PR includes a link to the issue that I am addressing

Addresses #369. I accidentally pushed the first commit of this directly to main. This PR is meant to put a reviewers eyes on the section, and also formally retrigger a readthedocs build.

Solution Description

Code Quality

• My code builds (or compiles) cleanly without any errors or warnings
• My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation

Project-Specific Pull Request Checklists

• I have added a function that requires a sync_tables command, and have added the neccesary sync_tables call

Bug Fix Checklist

• My fix includes a new test that breaks as a result of the bug (if possible)
• My change includes a breaking change
  • My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

New Feature Checklist

• I have added or updated the docstrings associated with my feature using the NumPy docstring format
• I have updated the tutorial to highlight my new feature (if appropriate)
• I have added unit/End-to-End (E2E) test cases to cover my new feature
• My change includes a breaking change
  • My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

Documentation Change Checklist

• Any updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format

Build/CI Change Checklist

• If required or optional dependencies have changed (including version numbers), I have updated the README to reflect this
• If this is a new CI setup, I have added the associated badge to the README

Other Change Checklist

• Any new or updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format.
• I have updated the tutorial to highlight my new feature (if appropriate)
• I have added unit/End-to-End (E2E) test cases to cover any changes
• My change includes a breaking change
  • My change includes backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings (if possible)

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions]

Before [f336b09]	After [50d6b6a]	Ratio	Benchmark (Parameter)
51.6±2ms	50.8±0.9ms	0.98	benchmarks.time_prune_sync_workflow
49.1±0.4ms	46.7±0.7ms	0.95	benchmarks.time_batch

Click here to view all benchmarks.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.53%. Comparing base (f336b09) to head (1789dbd).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #388   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.53%   95.53%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        1702     1702           
=======================================
  Hits         1626     1626           
  Misses         76       76           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nevencaplar]

The fact that when re-reading the documentation I could not see where the problem was means that the pull to the main was good.