-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the bug in Transaction.isSorobanTransaction to accommodate BumpFootprintExpirationOperation. #518
Merged
sreuland
merged 5 commits into
lightsail-network:soroban
from
overcat-deprecation:fix-is-soroban-tx
Sep 1, 2023
Merged
Fix the bug in Transaction.isSorobanTransaction to accommodate BumpFootprintExpirationOperation. #518
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
37e38af
Fix the bug in Transaction.isSorobanTransaction to accommodate BumpFo…
overcat 986dafb
remove "android-test" in deploy needs.
overcat 96eebcd
Bump version.
overcat c1a35a2
Switch the system used for Android testing to macos-13.
overcat d7a2b11
fix test
overcat File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think only single op needed in tx correct? otherwise isSorobanTransaction=false, but for non-tested reason, i.e. it's more than one op, it won't validate op instance mismatch yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test is to verify that a transaction containing multiple operations is not a soroban transaction. You can take a look at https://github.com/stellar/java-stellar-sdk/pull/518/files#diff-0114ab460186855a151f487001dae40013372c8430be55eeebdb6e24bfc12705R448
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there is already another test for asserting multi-op -
testIsSorobanTransactionMultiOperations
outcome, I think this test was intending to exercise a non-multi op code path but an incorrect op type, which seemed to be the intent, just pass oneoperation
and it should verify same false outcome.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry, I made a mistake. I have already corrected it. 🤦