-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LSPS2: ability to signal channel open failure #137
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ use crate::prelude::{HashMap, String, ToString, Vec}; | |
use crate::sync::{Arc, Mutex, RwLock}; | ||
|
||
use lightning::events::HTLCDestination; | ||
use lightning::ln::channelmanager::{AChannelManager, InterceptId}; | ||
use lightning::ln::channelmanager::{AChannelManager, FailureCode, InterceptId}; | ||
use lightning::ln::msgs::{ErrorAction, LightningError}; | ||
use lightning::ln::{ChannelId, PaymentHash}; | ||
use lightning::util::errors::APIError; | ||
|
@@ -362,7 +362,13 @@ impl OutboundJITChannelState { | |
let mut payment_queue_lock = payment_queue.lock().unwrap(); | ||
let payment_forwarded = | ||
OutboundJITChannelState::PaymentForwarded { channel_id: *channel_id }; | ||
let forward_htlcs = ForwardHTLCsAction(*channel_id, payment_queue_lock.clear()); | ||
let htlcs = payment_queue_lock | ||
.clear() | ||
.into_iter() | ||
.map(|(_, htlcs)| htlcs) | ||
.flatten() | ||
.collect(); | ||
let forward_htlcs = ForwardHTLCsAction(*channel_id, htlcs); | ||
Ok((payment_forwarded, Some(forward_htlcs))) | ||
}, | ||
OutboundJITChannelState::PaymentForwarded { channel_id } => { | ||
|
@@ -898,6 +904,79 @@ where | |
Ok(()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Used by LSP to fail intercepted htlcs backwards when the channel open fails for any reason. | ||
/// | ||
/// Should be called in response to receiving a [`LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel`] event. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This comment is a bit misleading. It should be called after we get the event, but of course only if the channel open failed? |
||
/// | ||
/// The JIT channel state is reset such that the payer can attempt payment again. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I wonder if we also expose a "abandon" variant that doesn't reset, but just prunes all state related to the channel open? |
||
/// [`LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel`]: crate::lsps2::event::LSPS2ServiceEvent::OpenChannel | ||
pub fn channel_open_failed( | ||
&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, user_channel_id: u128, | ||
) -> Result<(), APIError> { | ||
let outer_state_lock = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap(); | ||
match outer_state_lock.get(counterparty_node_id) { | ||
Some(inner_state_lock) => { | ||
let mut peer_state = inner_state_lock.lock().unwrap(); | ||
|
||
if let Some(intercept_scid) = | ||
peer_state.intercept_scid_by_user_channel_id.get(&user_channel_id).copied() | ||
{ | ||
if let Some(jit_channel) = | ||
peer_state.outbound_channels_by_intercept_scid.get_mut(&intercept_scid) | ||
{ | ||
let new_state = if let OutboundJITChannelState::PendingChannelOpen { | ||
payment_queue, | ||
.. | ||
} = &jit_channel.state | ||
{ | ||
let mut queue = payment_queue.lock().unwrap(); | ||
let payment_hashes = queue | ||
.clear() | ||
.into_iter() | ||
.map(|(payment_hash, _)| payment_hash) | ||
.collect::<Vec<_>>(); | ||
for payment_hash in payment_hashes { | ||
self.channel_manager.get_cm().fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason( | ||
&payment_hash, | ||
FailureCode::TemporaryNodeFailure, | ||
); | ||
} | ||
OutboundJITChannelState::PendingInitialPayment { | ||
payment_queue: payment_queue.clone(), | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { | ||
err: format!("Channel is not in the PendingChannelOpen state.",), | ||
}); | ||
}; | ||
jit_channel.state = new_state; | ||
} else { | ||
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { | ||
err: format!( | ||
"Failed to map the stored intercept_scid {} for the provided user_channel_id {} to a channel.", | ||
intercept_scid, | ||
user_channel_id, | ||
), | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
} else { | ||
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { | ||
err: format!( | ||
"Could not find a channel with user_channel_id {}", | ||
user_channel_id | ||
), | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
None => { | ||
return Err(APIError::APIMisuseError { | ||
err: format!("No counterparty state for: {}", counterparty_node_id), | ||
}); | ||
}, | ||
} | ||
Ok(()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Forward [`Event::ChannelReady`] event parameters into this function. | ||
/// | ||
/// Will forward the intercepted HTLC if it matches a channel | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Not sure this change is worth as it makes things more complex and you only make use of it in one place where you then have to
map
to get rid of theInterceptedHTLC
s. Why not just useInterceptedHTLC::payment_hash
instead? If you're worried about duplicates, could just usededup
or collect aHashSet
?