-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
blip-0004: add experimental HTLC endorsement signaling
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
156 additions
and
4 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ | ||
``` | ||
bLIP: 4 | ||
Title: Experimental Endorsement Signaling | ||
Status: Active | ||
Author: Carla Kirk-Cohen <[email protected]> | ||
Created: 2024-01-12 | ||
License: CC0 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Abstract | ||
|
||
HTLC endorsement signaling is a [proposed](https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/1071) | ||
component of a [hybrid approach](https://research.chaincode.com/2022/11/15/unjamming-lightning) | ||
to addressing [channel jamming attacks](https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/channel-jamming-attacks) | ||
against the Lightning Network. This bLIP outlines a proposal to deploy an | ||
experimental endorsement TLV to the network to provide real world data to | ||
inform specification of reputation algorithms. | ||
|
||
## Copyright | ||
|
||
This bLIP is licensed under the CC0 license. | ||
|
||
## Specification | ||
|
||
Experiment Parameters, expressed as unix time (seconds): | ||
* `experiment_start`: TODO: set once feature bit is widely deployed | ||
* `experiment_end`: 1767225600 | ||
|
||
### Adding an HTLC: `update_add_htlc`: | ||
|
||
1. `tlv_stream`: `update_add_htlc_tlvs` | ||
1. type: 106823(`endorsed`) | ||
2. data: | ||
* [`byte`:`endorsed`] | ||
|
||
The 3 least significant bits of the endorsement TLV are used to represent an | ||
endorsement value. A HTLC is considered to be endorsed if it is received | ||
with `endorsed`=7 and unendorsed otherwise. | ||
|
||
Sender: | ||
* If the current time is less than `experiment_end`: | ||
* if it is the original source of the HTLC: | ||
* if the current time is greater than or equal to `experiment_start`: | ||
* if it does not expect immediate fulfillment upon receipt by the | ||
final destination: | ||
* SHOULD set `endorsed` to `0`. | ||
* otherwise: | ||
* SHOULD set `endorsed` to `7`. | ||
* otherwise: | ||
* SHOULD set `endorsed` to `0` | ||
* MAY choose to set `endorsed` to `0` for some percentage of payments to | ||
prevent leaking its identity as the original sender. | ||
|
||
Receiver: | ||
* If the current time is less than `experiment_end`: | ||
* if running an experimental reputation algorithm: | ||
* SHOULD set `endorsed` at its discretion. | ||
* otherwise: | ||
* if `endorsed`=7 in the incoming `update_add_htlc`: | ||
* SHOULD set `endorsed`=7 on its outgoing `update_add_htlc` | ||
* otherwise: | ||
* SHOULD set `endorsed` to `0`. | ||
* MUST NOT use the experimental `endorsed` field in resource allocation | ||
decisions. | ||
|
||
## Deployment and Deprecation | ||
|
||
### Deployment | ||
|
||
Forwarding nodes can upgrade and begin to set `endorsed` signals immediately, | ||
as there is no privacy risk associated with propagating zero values. Feature | ||
bit signaling and a flag day are used to allow senders to set `endorsed` to `7` | ||
without leaking their identity as the original sender of the HTLC. | ||
|
||
1. Nodes on the network upgrade to support sending and forwarding zero value | ||
`endorsed` signals. | ||
2. Choose a `experiment_start` parameter based on deployment of the | ||
`htlc_endorsed` signal on the network. | ||
3. After `experiment_start` has passed, sending nodes start to set `endorsed` | ||
to `7` as described above. | ||
4. When `experiment_end` is reached, sending node on the network stop setting | ||
the experimental `endorsed` field and intermediate nodes will stop | ||
relaying it, so the signal will cease to propagate through the network. | ||
|
||
### Deprecation | ||
|
||
If `endorsement` is merged to the BOLTs, the experimental field will naturally | ||
be deprecated when `experiment_end` is reached. | ||
|
||
1. Nodes on the network may freely use an endorsement signal defined by the | ||
BOLTs, even if `experiment_end` has not yet been reached, as the experimental | ||
signal described in this bLIP is distinct from one outlined in the BOLTs. | ||
2. Once `experiment_end` has been reached, all nodes will stop relaying the | ||
experimental signal. | ||
3. In the next release, experimental code can safely be removed as it has been | ||
deprecated across the network. | ||
|
||
## Motivation | ||
|
||
The emergent properties of network-wide changes to Lightning are difficult to | ||
fully grasp without gathering real world data. This bLIP outlines a lightweight | ||
and reversible mechanism to assess various reputation algorithms in a read-only | ||
setting so that we can direct further specification in an informed manner. | ||
|
||
## Rationale | ||
|
||
Endorsement signals are copied from the incoming `update_add_htlc` to allow | ||
positive signals to propagate through the network. Nodes wishing to participate | ||
in active experimentation may set this signal according to their local | ||
reputation algorithm, and this signal will be passively propagated by the | ||
upgraded portion of the route. This experimental signal is used to observe | ||
the behavior of reputation algorithms under real-world conditions, but is not | ||
used to allocate resources so that the experiment does not impact payment | ||
traffic. | ||
|
||
A flag day is included to mitigate privacy concerns that setting the | ||
endorsement signal on payments will expose the identity of the original sender. | ||
Nodes participating in the experiment will signal the `htlc_endorsed` feature | ||
in their node announcement to help chose an appropriate `experiment_start`. | ||
Once a sufficient portion of the network is upgraded to relay these signals, the | ||
presence of positive endorsement does not expose the sender as the original | ||
source of the HTLC. Senders are also advised to only set a positive endorsement | ||
signal for some percentage of payments to further protect sender privacy. | ||
|
||
The `endorsed` TLV is encoded as a single `byte` rather than a boolean to allow | ||
flexible experimentation. Three bits of information are used to represent | ||
endorsement to allow for the future possibility of experimentation that relies | ||
on a range of endorsement values. HTLCs that are not endorsed include a TLV | ||
with a zero value byte so that they can be distinguished from those with no | ||
endorsement signal, which can be filtered out of experimental data as null | ||
values. | ||
|
||
This experiment is opened as a bLIP because it is not intended to be a | ||
permanent part of the lightning specification. If a BOLT with endorsement | ||
signaling is merged to the BOLTs, the two signals can be handled independently | ||
and the experimental signal described in this bLIP can be removed after the | ||
end of the experimental period. | ||
|
||
## Reference Implementations | ||
|
||
* [LND](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/8390) |